大气与环境光学学报 ›› 2012, Vol. ›› Issue (4): 241-.

• 大气光学 •    下一篇

测量大气边界层高度的激光雷达数据反演方法研究

王琳1,2, 谢晨波*1, 韩永3, 刘东1, 魏合理1   

  1. (1. 中国科学院安徽光学精密机械研究所中国科学院大气成分与光学重点实验室, 安徽 合肥 230031;
     2. 中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100049;
     3. 南京大学, 江苏 南京 210093 )
  • 收稿日期:2012-04-17 修回日期:2012-04-19 出版日期:2012-07-28 发布日期:2012-07-19
  • 通讯作者: 王琳(1986-),女,河北石家庄人,研究生,主要从事激光雷达数据反演方面的研究工作。 E-mail:cbxie@aiofm.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:王琳(1986-),女,河北石家庄人,研究生,主要从事激光雷达数据反演方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(41005014,40805006), 中国科学院知识创新工程青年人才领域专项前沿项目, 中国科学院大气成分与光学重点实验室开放课题基金项目资助

Comparison of Retrieval Methods of Planetary Boundary Layer Height from Lidar Data

WANG Lin1,2, XIE Chen-bo1, HAN Yong3, LIU Dong1, WEI He-li1   

  1. (1. Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Composition and Optical Radiation, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China; 
    2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 
    3. Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China )
  • Received:2012-04-17 Revised:2012-04-19 Published:2012-07-28 Online:2012-07-19

摘要:

大气边界层与人类关系最为密切,它的高度分布直接反映了近地面的大气状况。而今激光雷达已成为探测大气边界层时空演变特征的最有效手段,但如何从大量的测量数据中精确提取大气边界层高度则成为限制其应用的主要问题。介绍了四种常用的大气边界层高度提取方法,即梯度法、标准偏差法、曲线拟合法和小波协方差变换法,并结合自行研制的偏振拉曼米散射激光雷达的实测数据,分别对四种方法的提取结果进行分析。结果表明:四种方法各有优缺点,梯度法、标准偏差法和小波协方差变换法比较相近,准确性高但不稳定;而曲线拟合法的稳定性好,但提取结果相对折中。总体而言,曲线拟合法更适用于大量数据的批处理运算。

关键词: 激光雷达, 大气边界层, 梯度法, 标准偏差法, 曲线拟合法, 小波协方差变换法

Abstract:

As the most closely related layer with human, the planetary boundary layer's height directly reflects the state of the atmosphere near the ground. Now the lidar has become the most effective tool to observe the planetary boundary layer, but the retrieval of the planetary boundary layer height from a large number of measured data limited its application. Four kinds of commonly used methods, such as the gradient method, standard deviation method, fitting method and wavelet covariance transform method, are introduced and analyzed, with the continuously measured data of polarization-Raman-Mie scattering lidar. The results show that the four methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. The gradient method, the standard deviation method and the wavelet covariance transform method are similar and accurate in data process, but not stable. The fitting method has good stability, but its derivation is not so accurate relative to the three methods above. All in all, the fitting method is better to be used to process a large number of data.

Key words: lidar, planetary boundary layer, gradient method, standard deviation method, fitting method, wavelet covariance transform method

中图分类号: