EMI 南极臭氧柱总量反演研究

大气与环境光学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3): 215-222.

• “高分五号卫星大气数据反演”专辑 • 上一篇下一篇

EMI 南极臭氧柱总量反演研究

钱园园1;2, 司福祺1, 罗宇涵1, 周海金1, 杨东上1, 杨太平1, 王煜3∗

1 中国科学院合肥物质科学研究院安徽光学精密机械研究所, 中国科学院环境光学与技术重点实验室, 安徽合肥 230031; 2 中国科学技术大学, 安徽合肥 230036; 3 安徽大学物质科学与信息技术研究院, 安徽合肥 230601

收稿日期:2020-10-28 修回日期:2020-12-30 出版日期:2021-05-28 发布日期:2021-05-28
通讯作者: E-mail： yuwang@aiofm.ac.cn E-mail:sifuqi@aiofm.ac.cn
作者简介:钱园园 (1996 - ), 安徽铜陵人, 博士研究生, 主要从事差分吸收光谱技术方面的研究。 E-mail: yyqian@aiofm.ac.cn
基金资助:
Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (国家自然科学基金, 41676184, 41941011)

Retrieval of Antarctic Total Ozone Column From EMI

#br# QIAN Yuanyuan1;2, SI Fuqi1, LUO Yuhan1, ZHOU Haijin1, YANG Dongshang1, YANG Taiping1, WANG Yu3∗

1 Key Laboratory of Environmental Optics and Technology, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, HFIPS, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China; 2 University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China; 3 Institutes of Physical Science and Information Technology, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China

Received:2020-10-28 Revised:2020-12-30 Published:2021-05-28 Online:2021-05-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用差分吸收光谱技术 (DOAS) 反演了我国首个星载大气痕量气体差分吸收光谱仪 (EMI) 的臭氧斜柱浓度 (SCD), 通过 SCIATRAN 辐射传输模型建立了大气质量因子 (AMF) 的查找表, 最终得到 EMI 的臭氧垂直柱浓度 (即臭氧柱总量)。将 EMI、 OMI 和 TROPOMI 于 2018 年 11 月 2 日获得的南极区域臭氧柱总量进行了对比分析, 三者均观测到南极中高纬度 (30◦ S∼70◦ S) 的臭氧高值区域与南极内陆 (75◦ S∼90◦ S) 的臭氧低值区域, 且 EMI 与 OMI、 TROPOMI 的臭氧柱总量相关性 (R2) 分别为 0.977 和 0.979。进一步将 EMI 反演的臭氧柱总量与南极长城站 (62.22 S, 58.96 W) 地基天顶散射光差分吸收光谱仪 (ZSL-DOAS) 反演的臭氧柱总量进行对比, 二者相关性 (R2) 为 0.926。

关键词: 大气痕量气体差分吸收光谱仪, 差分吸收光谱技术, 南极, 臭氧柱总量, 查找表

Abstract: The slant column density (SCD) of ozone detected by Chinese first space-borne environmental trace gases monitoring instrument (EMI) was retrieved by using differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) method. Then the lookup table of atmospheric quality factor (AMF) was built based on SCIATRAN radiative transfer model, and the vertical column density of ozone (VCD, namely total ozone column) was finally obtained. A comparative analysis of the total ozone column from EMI, OMI and TROPOMI in the Antarctica on November 2, 2018 shows that EMI, OMI and TROPOMI all observed the high ozone values area in mid and high latitude of Antarctica (30◦ S∼70◦ S) and the low ozone values area in inland Antarctica (75◦ S∼90◦ S), and the correlation coefficients (R2) between EMI and OMI, TROPOMI are 0.977 and 0.958 respectively. Furthermore, the total ozone columns of EMI was compared with that of ground-based ZSL-DOAS at Great Wall station (62.22 S, 58.96 W) from October 25 to November 25, 2018, and the correlation coefficient (R2) is 0.926

Key words: environmental trace gases monitoring instrument, differential optical absorption spectroscopy; Antarctica, total ozone columns, lookup table

中图分类号:

X831

钱园园, 司福祺, 罗宇涵, 周海金, 杨东上, 杨太平, 王煜∗. EMI 南极臭氧柱总量反演研究[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2021, 16(3): 215-222.

QIAN Yuanyuan, SI Fuqi, LUO Yuhan, ZHOU Haijin, YANG Dongshang, YANG Taiping, WANG Yu∗. Retrieval of Antarctic Total Ozone Column From EMI[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, 2021, 16(3): 215-222.

参考文献 19

[1]	Li Gang, Tan Yanke, Li Chongyin, et al. The distribution characteristics of total ozone and its relationship with stratospheric
	temperature during boreal winter in the recent 30 years [J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2015, 58(5): 1475-1491.
	李刚, 谭言科, 李崇银, 等. 近30年北半球冬季臭氧总量分布特征及其与平流层温度的关系 [J]. 地球物理学报, 2015,
58	(5): 1475-1491.
[2]	Luo Yuhan, Liu Wenqing, Bian Lingen, et al. The retrieval of ozone column densities by passive differential optical absorption
	spectroscopy during summer at Zhongshan station, Antarctic [J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysi, 2011, 31(2): 456-460.
	罗宇涵, 刘文清, 卞林根, 等. 利用被动差分吸收光谱技术反演南极中山站地区夏季臭氧柱浓度 [J]. 光谱学与光谱分析,
20	11, 31(2): 456-460.
[3]	Paschou P, Koukouli M E, Balis D, et al. The effect of considering polar vortex dynamics in the validation of satellite total
	ozone observations [J]. Atmospheric Research, 2020, 238: 104870.
[4]	Farman J C, Gardiner B G, Shanklin J D. Large losses of total ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal CIOx/NOx interaction [J].
	Nature, 1985, 315: 207-210.
[5]	Yan Huanhuan, Wang Weihe, Zhang Xingying, et al. Ozone column retrieved from GF-5 satellite environmental trace gas
	monitoring instrument [J]. Aerospace Shanghai, 2019, 36(Sup 2): 199-203.
	闫欢欢, 王维和, 张兴赢, 等. 高分五号卫星大气痕量气体差分吸收光谱仪臭氧总量反演方法研究 [J]. 上海航天, 2019,
36	(增刊 2): 199-203.
[6]	Rozanov V V, Diebel D, Spurr R J D, et al. GOMETRAN: A radiative transfer model for the satellite project GOME, the
	plane-parallel version [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1997, 102(D14): 16683-16695.
[7]	Burrows J P, Holzle E, Goede A P H, et al. SCIAMACHY-scanning imaging absorption spectrometer for atmospheric chartography [J]. Acta Astronautica, 1995, 35(7): 445-451.
[8]	Nett H, Frerick J, Paulsen T, et al. The atmospheric instruments and their applications: GOMOS, MIPAS and SCIAMACHY
[J]	ESA Bulletin, 2001, 106: 77-87.
[9]	Compernolle S, Verhoelst T, Pinardi G, et al. Validation of Aura-OMI QA4ECV NO2 climate data records with ground-based
	DOAS networks: the role of measurement and comparison uncertainties [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2020, 20(13):
80	17-8045.
[10]	Xue R B, Wang S S, Li D R, et al. Spatio-temporal variations in NO2 and SO2 over Shanghai and Chongming Eco-Island
	measured by ozone monitoring instrument (OMI) during 2008-2017 [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 258: 120563.
[11]	Xie B, Zhang H, Wang Z L, et al. A modeling study of effective radiative forcing and climate response due to tropospheric
	ozone [J]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2016, 33(7): 819-828.
[12]	Shikwambana L, Mhangara P, Mbatha N. Trend analysis and first time observations of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide in
	South Africa using TROPOMI/Sentinel-5 P data [J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation,
20	20, 91: 102130.
[13]	Katerina G, Maria E K, Tijl V, et al. TROPOMI/S5P total ozone column data: Global ground-based validation and consistency
	with other satellite missions [J]. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2019, 12(10): 5263-5287.
[14]	Cheng L X, Tao J H, Valks P, et al. NO2 retrieval from the environmental trace gases monitoring instrument (EMI): Preliminary
	results and intercomparison with OMI and TROPOMI [J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(24): 3017.
[15]	Liu Li, Zheng Xiangdong, Chen Shu, et al. Validation study of FY-3A-TOU total ozone using ground-based data [J]. Chinese
	Journal of Space Science, 2015, 35(6): 696-706.
	刘利, 郑向东, 陈树, 等. 风云-3A 卫星 TOU 臭氧总量地基对比验证分析 [J]. 空间科学学报, 2015, 35(6): 696-706.
[16]	Wang Weihe, Zhang Xingying, An Xingqin, et al. Analysis for retrieval and validation results of FY-3 total ozone unit (TOU)
[J]	Chinese Science Bulletin, 2010, 55(17): 1726-1733.
	王维和, 张兴赢, 安兴琴, 等. 风云三号气象卫星全球臭氧总量反演和真实性检验结果分析 [J]. 科学通报, 2010, 55(17):
17	26-1733.
[17]	Veefkind J P, Johan F H, Ellen J B, et al. Total ozone from the ozone monitoring instrument (OMI) using the DOAS technique
[J]	IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2006, 44(5): 1239-1244.
[18]	Bogumil K, Orphal J, Homann T, et al. Measurements of molecular absorption spectra with the SCIAMACHY preflight
	model: instrument characterization and reference data for atmospheric remote-sensing in the 230-2380 nm region [J]. Journal
	of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 2003, 157(2-3): 167-184.
[19]	Platt U, Stutz J. Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy [M]. Physics of Earth and Space Environments. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008: 135-174.

EMI 南极臭氧柱总量反演研究

Retrieval of Antarctic Total Ozone Column From EMI

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 19

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	唐超礼, 郝德卫, 魏圆圆, 戴聪明, 魏合理 . 南极臭氧柱总量的时空变化特性与影响因素分析[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2023, 18(3): 201-213.
[2]	曹子昊, 曾议∗, 鲁晓峰, 廖捷, 杨东上, 常振, 司福祺, 奚亮, . 成像差分吸收光谱技术的软件研发与数据反演[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2022, 17(2): 249-257.
[3]	苏静明, 洪炎∗, 唐超礼, 严加琪. 基于OMI 的中国区域2005–2020 年间臭氧柱总量随经纬度变化特性研究[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2021, 16(6): 495-503.
[4]	王歆远, 司福祺∗, 赵敏杰, 周海金, 江宇, 汪世美. 星载EMI在轨光谱定标方法研究[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2021, 16(3): 177-185.
[5]	王肖汉, 徐翼洲, 张成歆∗, 吴跃, 孙中平, 刘诚, . 基于EMI 观测的珠三角地区对流层NO2 柱浓度时空变化特征分析[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2021, 16(3): 197-206.
[6]	杨东上, 曾议, 罗宇涵, 周海金, 司福祺∗, 刘文清. 基于EMI 遥感NO2 技术监测澳洲森林火灾活动[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2021, 16(3): 207-214.
[7]	杨太平, 司福祺∗, 周海金, 赵敏杰, 罗宇涵, 刘建国. EMI 云量反演及与TROPOMI 的对比研究[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2021, 16(3): 223-230.
[8]	乔瑞, 伽丽丽∗, 许华, 李正强, ∗, 朱思峰, 谢一凇, 洪津, 代海山, 麻金继. 基于高分五号DPC 氧气A 吸收波段的云顶压强反演[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2021, 16(3): 256-268.
[9]	郭映映, 齐贺香, 李素文∗, 牟福生∗. 基于MAX-DOAS 的淮北地区NO2柱浓度观测研究[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2021, 16(2): 107-116.
[10]	朱磊, 司福祺∗, 陈军, 刘凤垒, 赵敏杰, 邱晓晗. 星载大气痕量气体差分吸收光谱仪测试转台结构设计[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2021, 16(2): 158-166.
[11]	黄鸿, 兰洪勇, 黄云彪. 基于深度信念网络和极限学习机的SO2浓度检测[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2020, 15(3): 207-216.
[12]	胡丽莎, 李素文, 牟福生. 基于MAX-DOAS观测的淮北冬季NO2变化特征[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2020, 15(3): 217-223.
[13]	黄珊1,2,司福祺1,赵敏杰1,2,汪世美1,周海金1. 大气痕量气体差分吸收光谱仪地面数据评价软件设计[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2019, 14(3): 201-210.
[14]	韩雪冰曾议赵敏杰杨维周海金徐兴伟杨东上司福祺. 星载大气痕量气体差分吸收光谱仪数据的定标处理与存储方式研究[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2018, 13(4): 268-276.
[15]	王汝雯徐晋李昂谢品华. 基于短波红外波段吸收的CO2垂直柱浓度地基遥测反演方法研究[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2017, 12(1): 22-32.