基于LUR 模型下PM2.5 浓度的空间分布模拟分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要： PM2:5 是大气重要污染物之一, 模拟 PM2:5 浓度空间分布对于大气污染防治具有重要意义。将土地利用回归模型 (LUR) 应用到安徽省污染较重的皖北地区, 以监测点为中心, 建立半径分别为 0.5、 1、 1.5、 2、 3、 4、 5 km 的缓冲区, 结合土地利用因子、道路因子、污染源因子、气象因子、高程因子及人口因子共 105 个变量, 建立了该地区四季和年均 LUR 模型, 并通过留一交叉互验, 验证了模型精度。结果表明: 研究区 PM2:5 浓度受草地、湿地、降水量、相关湿度、气压、风速、二级公路、三级公路、废气污染企业、人口数量影响较大。调整 R2 分别为 0.828 (春)、 0.731 (夏)、 0.831 (秋)、 0.775 (冬)、 0.892 (年均); 均方根误差 (RMSE) 分别为 6.34 µg·m−3 (春)、 7.01 µg·m−3 (夏)、 6.28 µg·m−3 (秋)、 6.71 µg·m−3 (冬)、 5.33 µg·m−3 (年均); 模拟精度 R2 分别为 0.825 (春)、 0.730 (夏)、 0.834 (秋)、 0.772 (冬)、 0.897 (年均), 模型表现良好, 解释力强。从模拟的 PM2:5 浓度空间分布可以看出, 不同季节呈现明显不同的空间分布特征, 这与来自北方的大量污染颗粒物、当地的煤矿开采以及秋耕秸秆燃烧等潜在污染源有关。

关键词: PM2.5, 土地利用回归模型, 空间分布, 皖北地区

Abstract: PM2:5 is one of the important pollutants in the atmosphere, so simulating the spatial distribution of PM2:5 concentration is of great significance to the prevention and control of air pollution. The Land Use Regression (LUR) model was applied to the heavily polluted Northern Anhui region in Anhui Province, China. Taking the monitoring points as the center, the buffer zones with radius of 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 5 km were established respectively. Combined with 105 variables including land use factor, road factor, pollution source factor, meteorological factor, elevation factor and population factor, a four-season and annual average LUR model for this district was established, and the accuracy of the model was verified by leave-one-out cross validation. The results show that the PM2:5 concentration in the study area is greatly affected by grassland, wetland, rainfall, relative humidity, atmospheric pressure, wind speed, secondary roads, tertiary roads, air-polluting enterprise, and population. The adjusted R2 is 0.828 (spring), 0.731 (summer), 0.831 (autumn), 0.775 (winter) and 0.892 (annual average) respectively. The root mean square error (RMSE) is 6.34 µg·m−3 (spring), 7.01 µg·m−3 (summer), 6.28 µg·m−3 (autumn), 6.71 µg·m−3 (winter) and 5.33 µg·m−3 (annual average). The simulation accuracy R2 is 0.825 (spring), 0.730 (summer), 0.834 (autumn), 0.772 (winter) and 0.897 (annual average). The model shows good performance and strong explanatory power. As can be seen from the simulated spatial distribution of PM2:5 concentration, the spatial distribution characteristics in the area are obviously different in different seasons, which is related to a large number of pollution particles from the north, local coal mining, straw burning during autumn tillage and other potential pollution sources.

Key words: PM2.5, land use regression model, spatial distribution, Northern Anhui Province

中图分类号:

X513

杨明亮∗, 朱宗玖. 基于LUR 模型下PM2.5 浓度的空间分布模拟分析[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2022, 17(3): 347-359.

YANG Mingliang, ZHU Zongjiu. Simulation analysis of spatial distribution of PM2.5 concentration based on LUR model[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, 2022, 17(3): 347-359.

参考文献 17

[1]	Guo X B, Wei H Y. Progress on the health effects of ambient PM2:5 pollution [J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2013, 58(13):
11	71-1177.
	郭新彪, 魏红英. 大气 PM2:5 对健康影响的研究进展 [J]. 科学通报, 2013, 58(13): 1171-1177.
[2]	Sui W X, Wang H Y, Tang X, et al. Spatial-temporal distribution characteristics of PM2:5 and O3 over Shandong Province in
20	15 [J]. Environmental Monitoring in China, 2019, 35(2): 59-69.
	隋玟萱, 王颢樾, 唐晓, 等. 山东省 2015 年 PM2:5 和 O3 污染时空分布特征 [J]. 中国环境监测, 2019, 35(2): 59-69.
[3]	Wu J S, Wang X, Li J C, et al. Comparison of models on spatial variation of PM2:5 concentration: A case of Beijing-TianjinHebei region [J]. Environmental Science, 2017, 38(6): 2191-2201.
	吴健生, 王茜, 李嘉诚, 等. PM2:5 浓度空间分异模拟模型对比:以京津冀地区为例 [J]. 环境科学, 2017, 38(6): 2191-2201.
[4]	Zhang D, Woo S S. Real time localized air quality monitoring and prediction through mobile and fixed IoT sensing network
[J]	IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 89584-89594.
[5]	Zhao X, Hou L L, Wang X L, et al. Simulation of spatial distribution of PM2:5 and PM10 concentrations in Beijing in 2019
	based on LUR model [J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2020, 40(11): 4060-4069.
	赵雪, 侯丽丽, 王鑫龙, 等. 基于 LUR 模型的 2019 年北京地区 PM2:5 与 PM10 浓度空间分异模拟 [J]. 环境科学学报,
20	20, 40(11): 4060-4069.
[6]	Briggs D J, Collins S, Elliott P, et al. Mapping urban air pollution using GIS: A regression-based approach [J]. International
	Journal of Geographical Information Science, 1997, 11(7): 699-718.
[7]	Luo Y Q. Critical Issues in Land Use Regression Modeling of PM2:5 Concentration [D]. Changsha: Central South University,
	2014.
	罗艳青. PM2:5 浓度土地利用回归建模关键问题研究 [D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2014.
[8]	Hoek G, Beelen R, de Hoogh K, et al. A review of land-use regression models to assess spatial variation of outdoor air pollution
[J]	Atmospheric Environment, 2008, 42(33): 7561-7578.
[9]	Tang R, Blangiardo M, Gulliver J. Using building heights and street configuration to enhance intraurban PM10, NOX, and NO2
	land use regression models [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(20): 11643-11650.
[10]	Li J. LUR-based Analysis and Simulation of the Temporal-Spatial Characteristics of AQI in Wuhan, China [D]. Wuhan: Central
	China Normal University, 2017.
	李杰. 基于 LUR 模型的武汉市空气质量时空特征分析及模拟 [D]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2017.
[11]	Yang H O, Chen W B, Liang Z F. Relationship of PM2:5 concentration and land use type in Nanchang City based on LUR
	simulation [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(6): 232-239.
	阳海鸥, 陈文波, 梁照凤. LUR 模型模拟的南昌市 PM2:5 浓度与土地利用类型的关系 [J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(6):
23	2-239.
[12]	Wang J J, Xia X S, Cheng, et al. Temporal and spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of PM2:5 concentration
	in Hefei City [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2020, 29(06): 1413-1421.
	王佳佳, 夏晓圣, 程先富, 等.合肥市 PM2:5 浓度时空分布特征及影响因素分析 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(06):
14	13-1421.
[13]	Xu G, JiaoL M, Xiao F T, et al. Applying land use regression model to estimate spatial distribution of PM2:5 concentration in
	Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2016, 30(10): 116-120.
	许刚, 焦利民, 肖丰涛, 等. 土地利用回归模型模拟京津冀 PM2:5 浓度空间分布 [J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(10):
11	6-120.
[14]	Gong P, Zhang W, Yu L et al. New research paradigm for global land cover mapping [J]. National Remote Sensing Bulletin
20	16, 20(5): 1002-1016.
	宫鹏, 张伟, 俞乐, 等. 全球地表覆盖制图研究新范式 [J]. 遥感学报, 2016, 20(5): 1002-1016.
[15]	Wang R Z, Hu R M, Li P F et al. Monitoring and analysis of PM2:5 concentration spatial distribution based on LUR model [J].
	Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2020, 14(10): 2843-2852.
	王睿哲, 胡荣明, 李朋飞, 等. 基于 LUR 模型的 PM2:5 浓度空间分布监测及分析 [J]. 环境工程学报, 2020, 14(10):
28	43-2852.
[16]	Hoek G, Beelen R, Kos G, et al. Land use regression model for ultrafine particles in Amsterdam [J]. Environmental Science &
	Technology, 2011, 45(2): 622-628.
[17]	Henderson S B, Beckerman B, Jerrett M, et al. Application of land use regression to estimate long-term concentrations of
	traffic-related nitrogen oxides and fine particulate matter [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(7): 2422-2428.
[18]	Wu J S, Li J C, Peng J, et al. Applying land use regression model to estimate spatial variation of PM2:5 in Beijing, China [J].
	Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2015, 22(9): 7045-7061.
[19]	Wu J S, Liao X, Peng J, et al. Simulation and influencing factors of spatial distribution of PM2:5 concentrations in Chongqing
[J]	Environmental Science, 2015, 36(3): 759-767.
	吴健生, 廖星, 彭建, 等. 重庆市 PM2:5 浓度空间分异模拟及影响因子 [J]. 环境科学, 2015, 36(3): 759-767.
[20]	Du B Q, Yang M L, Zhang J R. Simulation analysis of spatial distribution of PM2:5 concentration in Beijing based on the LUR
	model [J]. Journal of Langfang Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 21(04): 51-55.
	杜宝强, 杨明亮, 张金润. 基于 LUR 模型的北京市 PM2:5 浓度的空间分布模拟 [J]. 廊坊师范学院学报 (自然科学版),
20	21, 21(04): 51-55.
[21]	Jiang X W, Ren ZY, Sun YJ. Spatial distribution simulation and influencing factors of PM2:5 in Xi′an City based on LUR and
	GIS [J]. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 45(3): 80-87.
	江笑薇, 任志远, 孙艺杰. 基于 LUR 和 GIS 的西安市 PM2:5 的空间分布模拟及影响因素 [J]. 陕西师范大学学报 (自然科
学版)	, 2017, 45(3): 80-87.
[22]	Han L, Zhao J Y, Gao Y J, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics of PM2:5 and PM10 in Xi′an City predicted by land use
	regression models [J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2020, 61: 102329.
[23]	Shi Y, Bilal M, Ho H C, et al. Urbanization and regional air pollution across South Asian developing countries—A nationwide
	land use regression for ambient PM2:5 assessment in Pakistan [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2020, 266: 115145.
[24]	Wang M, Beelen R, Bellander T, et al. Performance of multi-city land use regression models for nitrogen dioxide and fine
	particles [J]. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2014, 122(8): 843-849.
[25]	Song W Y, Yang Z, Wang P P, et al. Spatial distribution stimulation and population exposure of PM2:5 based on Land Use
	Regression—A case study of Hubei Province [J]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Natural Sciences), 2019, 53(3):
45	1-458.
	宋万营, 杨振, 王平平, 等. 基于 LUR 模型的大气 PM2:5 浓度分布模拟与人口暴露研究—以湖北省为例 [J]. 华中师范大
	学学报 (自然科学版), 2019, 53(3): 451-458.
[26]	Li J H, Zhu S W. Cautions about R2 [J]. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2013, 30(9): 152-160.
	李景华, 朱尚伟. 关于 R2 的几点质疑 [J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2013, 30(9): 152-160.
[27]	Yuan X Y, Ye Z X, Yang H J, et al. Characteristics of fine particles in urban road atmospheric environment in Chengdu [J].
	Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015, 9(9): 4598-4602.
	袁小燕, 叶芝祥, 杨怀金, 等. 成都市道路细颗粒物污染特征 [J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(9): 4598-4602.
[28]	Wang Z S, Fu X, Wang Z S, et al. Research progress of the hygroscopicity of atmospheric Particles [J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2013, 26(4): 341-349.
	王宗爽, 付晓, 王占山, 等. 大气颗粒物吸湿性研究 [J]. 环境科学研究, 2013, 26(4): 341-349.
[29]	Gao Z X, Ye J, Zhou H G, et al. The spatial-temporal characteristics of PM2:5 and PM10 and their relationships with meteorological factors in Jiangsu Province [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020, 43(7): 51-58.
	高振翔, 叶剑, 周红根, 等. 江苏省 PM2:5 和 PM10 时空变化特征及其与气象因子的关系 [J]. 环境科学与技术, 2020,
43	(7): 51-58.
[30]	Luan T, Guo X L, Zhang T H, et al. The scavenging process and physical removing mechanism of pollutant aerosols by
	different precipitation intensities [J]. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 2019, 30(3): 279-291.
	栾天, 郭学良, 张天航, 等. 不同降水强度对 PM2:5 的清除作用及影响因素 [J]. 应用气象学报, 2019, 30(3): 279-291.
[31]	Zheng Y J, Wang M M, Sun M, et al. Pollution trend and correlation analysis of PM2:5 and PM10 in Qiqihar [J]. Environmental
	Monitoring in China, 2018, 34(1): 60-68.
	郑永杰, 王梅梅, 孙萌, 等. 齐齐哈尔市 PM2:5 与 PM10 污染趋势及相关性分析 [J]. 中国环境监测, 2018, 34(1): 60-68.
[32]	Liang Z F, Chen W B, Zheng J, et al. Simulation of the distribution of main atmospheric pollutants and the influence of land
	use on them in central urban area of Nanchang City, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(3): 1005-1014.
	梁照凤, 陈文波, 郑蕉, 等. 南昌市中心城区主要大气污染物分布模拟及土地利用对其影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019,
30	(3): 1005-1014.
[33]	Zhang H X, Cheng X F, Chen R H. Analysis on the spatial-temporal distribution characteristics and key influencing factors of
	PM2:5 in Anhui Province [J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2018, 38(3): 1080-1089.
	张海霞, 程先富, 陈冉慧. 安徽省 PM2:5 时空分布特征及关键影响因素识别研究 [J]. 环境科学学报, 2018, 38(3):
10	80-1089.
[34]	Liu Y, Wang R S Zhang Y, et al. Dust concentration distribution patterns of different particulate matter in atmosphere in a
	surface coal mine of Wuhai City near the Yellow River during spring [J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 18(3):
	1-11.
	刘韵, 王若水, 张艳, 等. 春季黄河附近乌海市露天煤矿大气不同粒径粉尘质量浓度分布规律 [J]. 中国水土保持科学,
20	20, 18(3): 1-11.
[35]	Qiu Y, Wang J Q, Hu S H. Spatial-temporal distribution of PM2:5 and PM10−2:5 in Anhui Province, 2015–2016 [J]. Journal of
	Hefei University of Technology (Natural Science), 2020, 43(1): 113-118.
	裘阅, 汪家权, 胡淑恒. 2015–2016 年安徽省 PM2:5 和 PM10−2:5 时空分布特征 [J]. 合肥工业大学学报 (自然科学版), 2020,
43	(1): 113-118.
[36]	Chen X, Du P, Guan Q, et al. Application of ICP-MS and ICP-AES for studying on source apportionment of PM2:5 during haze
	weather in urban Beijing [J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2015, 35(6): 1724-1729.
	陈曦, 杜鹏, 关清, 等. ICP-MS 和 ICP-AES 用于北京雾霾天气 PM2:5 来源解析研究 [J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2015, 35(6):
17	24-1729.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

444

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	0	0	0	444

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	412	32
比例	93%	7%

摘要

1979

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	1979

	来源	本网站

	次数	1979
	比例	100%