大气与环境光学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (5): 857-868.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6141.2026.05.012

• 光学遥感 • 上一篇    

春节大规模人口流动对中国东部不同规模城市冠层热岛的影响差异

余孟千禧 1,2,3, 王旭红 1,2,3*, 冯子豪 1,2,3, 袁弈美 1,2,3, 李冰倩 1,2,3   

  1. 1 西北大学城市与环境学院, 陕西 西安 710127; 2 陕西省地表系统与环境承载力重点实验室, 陕西 西安 710127; 3 国家林业和草原局陕西西安国家城市生态系统定位观测研究站, 陕西 西安 710127
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-14 修回日期:2025-01-16 接受日期:2025-01-16 出版日期:2026-09-28 发布日期:2026-09-30
  • 通讯作者: E-mail: jqy_wxh@nwu.edu.cn E-mail:jqy_wxh@nwu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:余孟千禧 (2000- ), 女, 四川达州人, 硕士研究生, 主要从事城市热岛方面的研究。E-mail: yumengqianxi@stumail.nwu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目 (41971387)

The Impact of mass population migration during the Chinese New Year on canopy urban heat island of different cities in Eastern China

YU Mengqianxi1,2,3, WANG Xuhong1,2,3*, FENG Zihao1,2,3, YUAN Yimei1,2,3, LI Bingqian1,2,3   

  1. 1 College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127, China; 2 Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, Xi'an 710127, China; 3 Shaanxi Xi'an Urban Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Xi'an 710127, China
  • Received:2024-11-14 Revised:2025-01-16 Accepted:2025-01-16 Online:2026-09-28 Published:2026-09-30

摘要: 为了更加充分地了解大规模人口流动对冠层热岛 (CUHI) 的影响, 本研究通过简易城乡划分法确定城市区 域, 并运用最优参数地理探测器结合气象及多源遥感数据, 分析了2018 至2023 年春节期间中国东部不同规模城市的 冠层热岛差值 (ΔIc)。结果表明, 在春节前后7 周内, 大城市的热岛强度呈现显著的夜间降温趋势 (白天和夜间ΔIc分别 为 −0.09 ℃和 −0.15 ℃, 总体为V型), 而小城市则表现为白天增温趋势 (白天和夜间ΔIc分别为0.11 ℃和 −0.0004 ℃, 总 体为Λ型)。并且春节假期的影响因不同气候区域而异, 其中边缘亚热带地区的ΔIc变化最为显著。进一步分析表明, 夜间灯光差值 (XNTL) 和PM2.5差值 (XPM2.5) 是ΔIc的主要驱动因素, 都与ΔIc呈显著正相关, 其中大城市的相关性更为突 出 (XNTL: r = 0.45; XPM2.5: r = 0.58); 双因子交互探测显示, 人类活动是ΔIc差异的主导因子, 并通过与其他因素的交互 作用进一步放大影响。本研究揭示了短期人口流动对城市热岛效应的动态响应, 为制定促进城市可持续发展与宜居 性的政策提供科学依据。

关键词: 冠层热岛强度, 春节, 人口流动, 不同规模城市, 人类活动

Abstract: Objective The large-scale human migration during the Spring Festival dramatically changes urban population distribution and anthropogenic heat release, which exerts prominent influences on canopy urban heat island (CUHI) effect. Most existing relevant research focuses on surface urban heat island and megacity-scale descriptive analysis, lacking systematic quantitative comparisons of CUHI responses across different city scales under short-term population mobility, as well as quantitative identification of multi-factor driving mechanisms across diverse climatic zones. To fill these research gaps, this study quantifies the spatiotemporal differences of the CUHI intensity difference (ΔIc) between large and small cities in eastern China during Spring Festival, clarifies the divergent changing patterns of daytime and nighttime CUHI, identifies the core driving factors of ΔIc from different dimensions such as human activities, surface properties and meteorological conditions, and reveals the interactions between multiple influencing factors. The study aims to deepen the understanding of dynamic feedback of CUHI against transient population migration and provide scientific basis for urban thermal environment optimization and sustainable urban planning. Methods Multi-source datasets from 2018 to 2023, including ground meteorological observations, PM2.5 monitoring, remote sensing products such as nighttime light (NTL), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), albedo and land cover, digital elevation model and population density statistics, were collected and preprocessed via Google Earth Engine and ArcGIS platforms. Forty-eight cities distributed across mid-temperate, warm temperate, northern subtropical and marginal subtropical zones in eastern China (east of Hu Huanyong Line) were selected and categorized into large and small cities according to population density percentile threshold. A simplified urban-rural classification algorithm was adopted to distinguish urban and rural meteorological stations, and CUHI intensity (Ic) was expressed as the temperature difference between urban and rural observation sites. The research period covered seven weeks surrounding the Spring Festival (three weeks before, Spring Festival week, three weeks after), with the Spring Festival week defined as experimental period and the remaining six weeks as background period. And then ΔIc was calculated as the average difference of Ic between the experimental period and the background period. Furthermore, an optimal parameter-based geographical detector model was employed to conduct single-factor detection and pairwise factor interaction analysis, while Pearson correlation analysis was used to quantify the correlation between core human activity indicators (XNTL, changes of NTL; XPM2.5, changes of PM2.5) and nighttime ΔIc of cities with different scales. Results and Discussion  Obvious opposite evolving trends of ΔIc were found between large and small cities around the Spring Festival. Large cities presented a V-shaped CUHI variation with overall declined heat island intensity, and their average daytime ΔIc was − 0.09 ° C and nighttime ΔIc was − 0.15 ° C, driven by massive out-migration and reduced anthropogenic heat and pollutant emission. In contrast, small cities displayed a Λ-shaped trend featured by daytime warming, with daytime ΔIc reaching 0.11 °C and nighttime ΔIc close to −0.0004 °C due to massive returning population and intensified daily human activities. Spatially, ΔIc fluctuated most drastically in the marginal subtropical regions among all climate zones. Single-factor geographical detection verified that XPM2.5 (q = 0.44) and XNTL (q = 0.34), two proxies of human activity variations, were the dominant driving factors of nighttime ΔIc, and their explanatory power far exceeded that of surface parameters and meteorological elements. Pearson correlation results indicated that compared to small cities, the positive correlations between the two indicators and ΔIc in large cities (r = 0.58 for XPM2.5, r = 0.45 for XNTL) were significantly stronger. Factor interaction analysis showed that roughly 75% of pairwise interactions belonged to nonlinear or two-factor enhancement type, and the interaction between XNTL and XPM2.5 yielded the highest explanatory capacity (q = 0.938). Overall, meteorological and land surface factors could amplify the impact of human activities on CUHI through synergistic interactions. Particularly, some cities showed atypical ΔIc performances due to the influence of regional industrial layout, winter central heating and vegetation coverage expansion, further verifying the compound regulation effect of localized socioeconomic and environmental conditions on urban thermal environment. Conclusions  It is shown that short-term large-scale population migration during the Spring Festival period dominates the divergent daytime and nighttime CUHI evolution patterns of large and small cities in eastern Chinese. Population outflow reduces anthropogenic interference and weakens the CUHI of large cities especially at night, whereas population inflow remarkably raises daytime CUHI intensity of small cities. PM2.5 and nighttime light variations, which represent changes in human activities, are the primary drivers of ΔIc heterogeneity. Their regulatory effects on CUHI can be further amplified via their combined action with surface and meteorological factors, and such driving effects are more pronounced in densely populated large cities. Climatic background has an evident spatial modulation effect on CUHI responses caused by population mobility, with the thermal environment variation in marginal subtropical cities being the most sensitive. This study quantitatively confirms the close linkage between transient human mobility and CUHI, providing data support for differentiated thermal environment management in cities with different scales. Future research can combine high-temporalresolution remote sensing and accurate population flow data to explore multi-dimensional CUHI influencing pathways and develop targeted human activity control schemes to mitigate urban heat island risks.

Key words: canopy urban heat island, Chinese New Year, massive human migration, cities of different sizes, human activities

中图分类号: