膜采样与β射线法测定气溶胶PM2.5质量浓度的对比分析

大气与环境光学学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (2): 149-157.

• “大气环境光学探测技术”专辑 • 上一篇下一篇

膜采样与β射线法测定气溶胶PM2.5质量浓度的对比分析

张晓春1,2,3*, 赵亚南2,4, 贾小芳2

（1.中国气象科学研究院，北京，100081；
2.中国气象局气象探测中心,北京,100081；
3.中国科学院大学，北京，100049；
4.中国气象局气象干部培训学院,北京,100081）

收稿日期:2014-12-25 修回日期:2015-02-16 出版日期:2015-03-28 发布日期:2015-04-02
通讯作者: 张晓春（1968—），男，天津人，高级工程师，主要从事大气成分观测与研究工作。 E-mail:xczhang@cams.cma.gov.cn
作者简介:张晓春（1968—），男，天津人，高级工程师，主要从事大气成分观测与研究工作。
基金资助:
公益性行业（气象）科研专项（GYHY201206037）、中国气象局气象关键技术集成与应用项目（CMAGJ2013Z14）资助

Comparison and Analysis of Measurement of PM2.5 Between Filter-based Sampling Method and β-ray Attenuation Method

ZHANG Xiaochun1,2,3, ZHAO Yanan2,4, JIA Xiaofang2

（1.Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;
2. Meteorological Observation Center of CMA, Beijing 100081, China;
3. University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
4. China Meteorological Administration Meteorological Training Center, Beijing 100081, China)

Received:2014-12-25 Revised:2015-02-16 Published:2015-03-28 Online:2015-04-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用β射线法气溶胶质量浓度自动观测仪器和膜采样设备，于2013年9月至10月在北京上甸子大气本底站进行了气溶胶PM2.5质量浓度的自动观测和人工采样方法的对比试验。结果表明，两种方法的观测结果间具有较好的一致性，呈显著的线性相关关系；在PM2.5质量浓度较低 (<35 μg•m-3)和较高（>250 μg•m-3）时，两种方法间的偏差较大；随着空气PM2.5质量浓度的增加，自动观测方法与人工方法观测结果间的偏差逐渐增大。两种方法间的线性回归方程斜率、截距和相关系数均达到了国家环境保护标准HJ 653-2013的有关要求。对全部观测数据、>10 μg•m-3和10～150 μg•m-3浓度范围内的数据分别建立了回归订正方程，同时，根据不同气团轨迹条件也建立了订正方程，订证效果表明以10~150 μg•m-3范围内数据建立的回归订正方程为最优。

关键词: PM2.5, β射线法, 膜采样, 对比分析

Abstract:

A compared experiment of PM2.5 mass concentration automatic and manual sampling methods was carried out in Shangdianzi Atmospheric Background Station in Beijing from September to October in 2013 by using ray automatic observation instruments and filter-based sampling equipment. The results showed that there is good consistency and significant linear relationship between the observation data of the two methods; when PM2.5 mass concentration is lower than 35μg•m-3 or higher than 250 μg•m-3, the deviation between the two methods is larger than other circumstances; along with the increase of PM2.5 mass concentration, the deviation of two methods increased gradually. The Linear regression equation’s slope, intercept and correlation coefficient between the two methods all reach the relevant requirements of the people's Republic of China State Environmental Protection Standard of HJ 653-2013. For all observation data, great than 10 μg•m-3 and the range data of 10 ~ 150 μg•m-3, a correct regression equation is established respectively, and also according to the different air back trajectories conditions correct equations are established. The correction effects shows that the established equation within the range data of 10 ~ 150 μg•m-3 is the best one.

Key words: PM2.5, β-ray method, filter sampling, comparison and analysis

中图分类号:

P413

张晓春赵亚南贾小芳. 膜采样与β射线法测定气溶胶PM2.5质量浓度的对比分析[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2015, 10(2): 149-157.

ZHANG Xiao-Chun, ZHAO Ya-Na, JIA Xiao-Fang. Comparison and Analysis of Measurement of PM2.5 Between Filter-based Sampling Method and β-ray Attenuation Method[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, 2015, 10(2): 149-157.

参考文献

[1] Liu Qiang, Wang Mingxing, Li Jing, et al. Present research on atmospheric aerosol and its trends [J]. China Powder Science and Technology, 1999, 5(3): 20-26(in Chinese).
刘强, 王明星, 李晶, 等. 大气气溶胶研究现状和发展趋势 [J]. 中国粉体技术, 1999, 5(3): 20-26.
[2] Lin J J. Characterization of the major chemical species in PM2.5 in the Kaohsiung City, Taiwan [J]. Atmos. Environ., 2002, 36(12): 1911-1920.
[3] Lohmann U, Feichter J. Global indirect aerosol effects: a review [J]. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2005, 5: 715-737.
[4] Menon S, Hansen J, Nazarenko L, et al. Climate effects of black carbon aerosols in China and India [J]. Science, 2002, 297: 2250-2253.
[5] Yokouchi Y, Ambe Y. Aerosols formed from the chemical reaction of monoterpenes and ozone [J]. Atmos. Environ.,2007, 41(Supplement1): 192-197.
[6] Chimidza S, Moloi K. Identification of sources of aerosol particles in three locations in eastern Botswana [J]. J. Geophys. Res., 2000, 105( D14): 17811-17818.
[7] Bai Zhipeng, Dong Haiyan, Cai Binbin, et al. Dust and visibility [J]. the Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, 2006, (z2): 36-41(in Chinese).
白志鹏, 董海燕, 蔡斌彬, 等. 灰霾与能见度研究进展 [J]. 过程工程学报, 2006, (z2): 36-41.
[8] Song Yu, Yang Xiaoyan, Fang Chen, et al. Relationship between the visibility degradation and particle pollution in Beijing [J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2003, (4): 468-471(in Chinese).
宋字, 唐孝炎, 方晨, 等. 北京市能见度下降与颗粒物污染的关系 [J]. 环境科学学报, 2003, (4): 468-471.
[9] Wang Qin, Li Tiantian, Chen Chen, et al. The PM2.5 pollution character of fog and haze and its impact on human health [J]. National Medical Journal of China, 2013, 93(34): 2691-2694(in Chinese).
王秦, 李湉湉, 陈晨, 等. 我国雾霾天气PM2.5污染特征及其对人群健康的影响 [J]. 中华医学杂志, 2013, 93(34): 2691-2694.
[10] Pan Benfeng, Wang Wei, Li Liang, et al. Analysis of the reason of formation and the characteristic of pollution about fog or haze at key cities in autumn and winter in China [J]. Environment and Sustainable Development, 2013, (1): 33-36(in Chinese).
潘本锋, 汪巍, 李亮,等. 我国大中型城市秋冬季节雾霾天气污染特征与成因分析 [J]. 环境与持续发展, 2013, (1): 33-36.
[11] Zhang Xiaoye, Sun Junying, Wang Yaqiang, et al. Factors contributing to haze and fog in China (in Chinese), Chinese Science Bulletin, 2013, 58(13):1178-1187(in Chinese).
张小曳, 孙俊英, 王亚强,等. 我国雾-霾成因及其治理的思考 [J]. 科学通报, 2013, 58(13): 1178-1187.
[12] Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China, General Administration of Quality Supervision. Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, National Standard of the People’s Republic of China 《Ambient air quality standards》（GB3095-2012） [S].
2012. 环境保护部, 国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 中华人民共和国国家标准《环境空气质量标准》（GB3095-2012） [S]. 2012.
[13] Cui Yanqing, Wang Chunying, Shang Yongchang. Development of particulate matter in ambient air (PM2.5) monitoring technique [J]. China Environmental Protection Industry, 2012, (4): 8-13(in Chinese).
崔延青, 王春迎, 尚永昌. 大气细粒子（PM2.5）监测技术进展 [J]. 中国环保产业, 2012, (4): 8-13.
[14] Dan Dezhong. Advance on comparison research of monitoring techniques for PM2.5 in ambient air [J]. China Measurement & Test, 2013, (2): 1-5(in Chinese).
但德忠. 环境空气PM2.5监测技术及其可比性研究进展 [J]. 中国测试, 2013,(2): 1-5.
[15] Tao Weiwei, Xu Xiaonan, Hua Haining. PM2.5 monitoring technique and the prevention and control measures [J]. Journal of Shandong Jiaotong University, 2013, 21(2): 80-83.
陶巍巍, 许晓楠, 华海宁. PM2.5监测技术及防控措施研究 [J]. 山东交通学院学报, 2013, 21(2): 80-83.
[16] Zhou Qiang, Liang Handong, Li Jinying. The instrumental analysis of atmospheric particulates [J]. Journal of Instrumental Analysis, 2004, (5): 132-135.
周强, 梁汉东, 李金英. 大气颗粒物的仪器分析方法 [J]. 分析测试学报, 2004, (5): 132-135.
[17] Zhang Yuyan. The contrast analysis between β-ray decay method and ambient particulate monitor to detect air PM10 [J]. Instrumentation Analysis Monitoring, 2006, (1): 45-46(in Chinese).
张予燕. β射线法与振荡天平法测定环境中PM10的对比分析 [J]. 仪器仪表与分析监测, 2006, (1): 45-46.
[18] Zhang Yuanmao, Zheng Yefei. Comparison of ?-ray decay method and tapered elemet osillating microbalance method to detect PM10 [J]. The Administration and Technique of Environmental Monitoring, 2002, (4): 21-23(in Chinese).
张元茂, 郑叶飞. ?射线衰减发与微量震荡天平法测定PM10的比较 [J]. 环境监测管理与技术, 2002, (4): 21-23.
[19] Zhang Zhanyi, Li Fengguo, Yang Guanling, et al. Development of analyzer for atmospheric particulate matter concentration and its performance test [J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2006, (11): 767-773(in Chinese).
张展毅, 李丰果, 杨冠玲, 等. 大气颗粒物浓度自动监测仪器的研制及性能比对测试 [J]. 北京大学学报, 2006, (11): 767-773.
[20] Charrona A, Harrisona R M, Moorcroft S, et al. Quantitative interpretation of divergence between PM10 and PM2.5 mass measurement by TEOM and gravimetric (Partisol) instruments [J]. Atmos. Environ, 2004, 38(3): 415-423.
[21] Kinghama S, Duranda M, Aberkane T, et al. Winter comparison of TEOM, MiniVol and DustTrak PM10 monitors in a woodsmoke environment [J]. Atmos. Environ., 2006, 40: 338-347.
[22] Fan Xia. Applicative comparison of DHS β-Ray method to detect PM2.5 [J]. Instrumentation Analysis Monitoring, 2013, (2): 40-42(in Chinese).
樊霞. DHS在β射线法监测PM2.5中的应用比较 [J]. 仪器仪表与分析监测, 2013, (2): 40-42.
[23] Pan Benfeng, Wang Wei, Wang Ruibin, et al. Analysis on the construct of fine particle monitoring network and monitoring technique system in China [J]. Environment and Sustainable Development, 2013, (3): 9-13(in Chinese).
潘本锋, 汪巍, 王瑞斌, 等. 我国PM2.5监测网络布局与监测方法体系构建策略分析 [J]. 环境与可持续发展, 2013, (13): 9-13.
[24] Feng Jin. Development of PM2.5 monitoring technology and assurance of accurate measurement result [J]. Metrology & Measurement Technique, 2014, (2): 52-54(in Chinese).
冯进. PM2.5监测技术的发展及测量数据准确性的保障 [J]. 计量与测试技术, 2014, (2): 52-54.
[25] Met One Instruments, Inc. BAM 1020 Particulate Monitor Operation Manual, Revision B [M]. 2001.
[26] Wen Huayang, Xu Guangqing, Zhang Hu, et al. Data evaluation and the advantage of the double automatic weather stations [J]. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 2012, (6):748-753(in Chinese).
温华洋, 徐光清, 张虎, 等. 双套自动站数据评估及其优势探讨 [J]. 应用气象学报, 2012, (6): 748-753.
[27] Chai Yanhong, Cao Xing, Zhang Jun, et al. Precipitation difference and relativity between automatic and conventional observation over Urumqi Region [J]. Desert and Oasis Meteorology, 2011, (5): 47-51(in Chinese).
柴岩红, 曹兴, 张军, 等. 乌鲁木齐地区自动与人工观测降雨量的差异及相关性分析 [J]. 沙漠与绿洲气象, 2011, (5): 47-51.
[28] Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China. The people's Republic of China State Environmental Protection Standard《Specifications and Test Procedures for Ambient Air Quality Continuous Automated Monitoring System for PM10 and PM2.5》(HJ 653-2013) [S]. 2013(in Chinese).
环境保护部. 中华人民共和国国家环境保护标准《环境空气颗粒物（PM10和PM25）连续自动监测系统技术要求及检测方法》(HJ 653-2013) [S]. 2013.
[29] Draxler R R, Rolph G D. NOAA Air Resources Laboratory. HYSPLIT- HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory Model [OL]. 2015, http://ready.arl.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php.
[30] Rolph G D. NOAA Air Resources Laboratory. READY- Real-time Environmental Applications and Display sYstem [OL]. 2015, http://ready.arl.noaa.gov.

膜采样与β射线法测定气溶胶PM2.5质量浓度的对比分析

Comparison and Analysis of Measurement of PM2.5 Between Filter-based Sampling Method and β-ray Attenuation Method

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王莉君, 周玉, 万丽娟, 程亮亮. 基于贝叶斯的大数据模型在大气污染成因分析中的应用[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2023, 18(3): 227-234.
[2]	曹媛, 宫明艳, 沈非, 麻金继, 杨光, 林锡文, . 中国区域PM2.5浓度估算以及影响因素解析[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2023, 18(3): 245-257.
[3]	孙二昌, 麻金继, 吴文涵, 杨光, 郭金雨, . Himawari-8气溶胶变分同化对PM2.5污染模拟的改进[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2023, 18(1): 59-72.
[4]	陈玉宽, 王朔, 徐学哲, 赵卫雄, 盖艳波, 方波, 张为俊, ∗. 安徽省寿县气溶胶消光系数变化特征分析[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2022, 17(5): 533-541.
[5]	杨明亮∗, 朱宗玖. 基于LUR 模型下PM2.5 浓度的空间分布模拟分析[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2022, 17(3): 347-359.
[6]	彭立平, 黄毅∗, 郑凯莉. 旅游活动强度变化下旅游地大气PM2.5浓度响应研究[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2021, 16(6): 471-482.
[7]	贾宏亮, 罗俊, 肖东升∗. 基于遥感数据和GWR 模型的成都PM2.5 浓度时空分布特征研究[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2021, 16(6): 529-540.
[8]	郭映映, 齐贺香, 李素文∗, 牟福生∗. 基于MAX-DOAS 的淮北地区NO2柱浓度观测研究[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2021, 16(2): 107-116.
[9]	陈杰, 李正强∗, 常文渊∗, 张莹, 魏瑗瑗, 谢一凇, 葛邦宇, 张驰, . 基于改进GSI 系统的气溶胶变分同化对WRF-Chem PM2.5 分析和预报的影响评估[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2020, 15(5): 321-333.
[10]	施益强, 陈坰烽, 王坚, 黄宝燕, 吴君, 陈颖锋, 肖钟湧, ∗. 厦门市MODIS 气溶胶光学厚度与PM2.5 的时空特征及其相关性[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2020, 15(5): 334-346.
[11]	郑凯莉, 黄毅∗, 姚小云, 胡晓琰. 张家界市PM2.5、NO2 与旅游活动及天气因素的相关性分析[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2020, 15(5): 347-356.
[12]	马潇瑶, 肖正辉∗, 何立志, 曹运江. 湘潭市PM2.5 中二次水溶性无机离子及其气态前体物的污染特征[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2020, 15(4): 296-304.
[13]	胡丽莎, 李素文, 牟福生. 基于MAX-DOAS观测的淮北冬季NO2变化特征[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2020, 15(3): 217-223.
[14]	潘楠卢新卫. 2016年春节期间西安市大气颗粒物中多环芳烃的污染特征[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2018, 13(3): 208-217.
[15]	曹景丽王明仕韩文生桂晨露宋党育. 河南省PM2.5时空分布特征研究[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2018, 13(1): 42-51.