信噪比对DIMM法测量大气相干长度的影响

大气与环境光学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3): 178-184.

信噪比对DIMM法测量大气相干长度的影响

沙洋1,2, 靖旭1 *, 吴毅1, 侯再红1

(1 中国科学院安徽光学精密机械研究所中国科学院大气光学重点实验室，合肥 230031；
2 中国科学技术大学，合肥 230031)

收稿日期:2017-01-05 修回日期:2017-02-07 出版日期:2018-05-28 发布日期:2018-05-31
作者简介:沙洋 (1991-)，男, 汉族，湖北洪湖人，硕士研究生，主要从事激光大气探测方面的研究。
基金资助:
Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (国家自然科学基金,41405014)

Influence of Signal to Noise Ratio on Atmospheric Coherence Length Measured by DIMM

SHA Yang1,2, JING Xu1*, WU Yi1, HOU Zaihong1

(1 Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Optics, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China;
2 University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China)

Received:2017-01-05 Revised:2017-02-07 Published:2018-05-28 Online:2018-05-31
Supported by:
Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (国家自然科学基金,41405014)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在大气相干长度r0的测量中，相同的仪器和数据处理方法，不同的信噪比对实验测得结果有较大影响。通过分析实测中的噪声模型，利用matlab仿真，保持信号光强度不变，在光斑图像上添加高斯噪声，改变图像的信噪比。以不含背景时的光斑图像求得的r0作真值，分别求出不同信噪比下r0对真值的相对偏差。发现当信噪比小于5时，相对偏差大幅增加。在相同信噪比下，采用不同的背景处理方法，发现减去平均背景后，剩下的高斯噪声对质心位置的影响很小。在不同信噪比下，减1倍平均背景及0.6倍背景起伏标准差后相对偏差整体表现最小。

关键词: 大气相干长度, 信噪比, 相对偏差, 仿真, DIMM

Abstract:

In the field measurement, different signal to noise ratios(SNR) have a great impact on the experimental results with the same instrument and data processing methods. By analyzing the noise model measured in the field, the same noise is added to the spot image simulated to change the SNR while the signal intensity is kept unchanged. When the SNR is less than 5, the relative deviation increased significantly. Then different methods are used to subtract the background noise under the same SNR, and it is found that the Gaussian noise has little effect on the centroid position after subtracting the average background value. The results show that the overall performance of the subtraction of 1 times average background and 0.6 times background fluctuation standard deviation is found to be the best.

Key words: atmospheric coherence length, signal to noise ratio, relative deviation; simulation, DIMM

中图分类号:

TP391.9

沙洋靖旭吴毅侯再红. 信噪比对DIMM法测量大气相干长度的影响[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2018, 13(3): 178-184.

SHA Yang, JING Xu, WU Yi, HOU Zai-Hong. Influence of Signal to Noise Ratio on Atmospheric Coherence Length Measured by DIMM[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, 2018, 13(3): 178-184.

参考文献

[1] Rao Ruizhong. Light Propagation in the Atmospheric Turbulence [M]. Hefei: Anhui Science and Technology Press, 2005(in Chinese). 饶瑞中. 激光在湍流大气中的传播 [M]. 合肥: 安徽科学技术出版社, 2005.
[2] Fried D L. Statistics of a geometric representation of wavefront distortion [J]. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1965, 55(11): 1427-1435.
[3] Liu Zhong, Qian Yaohui, Qian Ping. Two problems on the principle of the measurement of seeing by using the differential image motion method [J]. Publication of Yunnan Observator, 1993, 2: 54-60(in Chinese).
刘忠, 邱耀辉, 钱苹. 关于差分像运动法视宁度测量原理中的两个问题 [J]. 云南天文台台刊, 1993, 2: 54-60.
[4] Yu Longkun, Wu Yi, Hou Zaihong, et al. Study on the measurement of coherence length by differential image motion monitor [J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2013, 33(12): 1201004(in Chinese).
于龙昆, 吴毅, 侯再红,等. 利用差分像运动监测仪法测大气相干长度的研究 [J]. 光学学报, 2013, 33(12): 1201004.
[5] Tan Huisong, Cen Xuefen, Qian Tonglin. The factors influencing the seeing measurement by the DIMM [J]. Publication of Yunnan Observator, 2002, 1: 38-46(in Chinese).
谭徽松, 岑学奋, 钱铜铃. 用DIMM测视宁度的几个问题 [J]. 云南天文台台刊, 2002, 1: 38-46.
[6] Sarazin M, Roddier F. The ESO differential image motion monitor [J]. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1990, 227: 294-300.
[7] Ma X Y, Rao C H, Zheng H Q. Error analysis of CCD-based point source centroid computation under the background light [J]. Optics Express, 2009, 17(10): 8525-8541.
[8] Lu Qianian, Hou Zaihong, Jing Xu, et al. Influence of sky background on data of day-night atmospheric coherence length monitor [J]. Laser & Infrared, 2012, 42(8): 921-924.
陆茜茜, 侯再红, 靖旭, 等. 昼夜大气相干长度仪的数据误差分析 [J]. 激光与红外, 2012, 42(8): 921-924(in Chinese).
[9] Tokovinin A. From differential image motion to seeing [J]. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2002, 114: 1156-1166.

[1]	丁丽, 刘双喜, 胡景波, 邱杰, 王磊, 俞旭枫. 三种不同类型日照仪器观测数值对比分析[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2020, 15(4): 251-260.
[2]	周田华, 范婷威, 马剑, 陆婷婷, 胡谷雨, 朱小磊, 陈卫标. 光束发射参数对蓝绿激光海洋传输特性的影响[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2020, 15(1): 40-47.
[3]	白米粒李健军高冬阳胡友勃谢臣瑜闫静郑小兵. 双通道自校准辐射计与辐亮度标准探测器的比对实验研究[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2019, 14(4): 296-302.
[4]	桂利佳1,曾议2*,司福祺2. "GF-5"卫星差分吸收光谱仪热控设计及验证[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2019, 14(2): 103-110.
[5]	周玉松梅海平王钰茹. 大气湍流影响星地相干激光通信的数值仿真[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2018, 13(4): 258-267.
[6]	董婷吴毅侯再红靖旭谭逢富何枫. 利用闪烁和到达角起伏测量横向风速的对比研究[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2017, 12(4): 254-259.
[7]	王汝雯徐晋李昂谢品华. 基于短波红外波段吸收的CO2垂直柱浓度地基遥测反演方法研究[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2017, 12(1): 22-32.
[8]	曾议桂利佳赵晓翔刘凤垒薛辉司福祺. 星载差分吸收光谱仪热设计与试验研究[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2015, 10(6): 488-494.
[9]	吕炜煜苑克娥魏旭胡顺星王建国. 华南山区秋冬季节大气光学湍流初步测量分析[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2015, 10(3): 216-223.
[10]	黄克涛吴毅侯再红靖旭于龙昆崔利果. 不同下垫面水平大气相干长度的测量与分析[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2014, 9(3): 173-178.
[11]	江珊巩彩兰胡勇孟鹏. 短波红外吸收带林火与背景辐射亮度比较分析[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2014, 9(3): 223-228.
[12]	曾议桂利佳赵晓翔薛辉司福祺. 空间遥感器CCD模块热设计与仿真分析[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2013, 8(5): 364-371.
[13]	江榕宏何兴道吴涛丁文超冯静. 瑞利-米散射激光雷达的系统设计及仿真计算[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2013, 8(4): 306-313.
[14]	孟廷易维宁黄红莲杜丽丽. 不同观测方向下的遥感偏振图像仿真[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2013, 8(4): 282-286.
[15]	丁国歌杨世植崔生成. 帧转移型面阵CCD成像模型与仿真[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2013, 8(3): 195-202.