喀斯特地区的高分一号与Landsat8遥感影像归一化水体指数定量比较

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以百色市田阳县右江河谷为研究样区,定量比较喀斯特地区的高分一号与Landsat8影像归一化水体指数
(Normalized difference water Index, NDWI),以期为喀斯特地区的水资源研究提供科学支撑。选择喀斯
特河谷盆地和喀斯特石山两类不同地貌类型为研究区,分别计算两类地区两类影像的NDWI,结合目视解译,
对两类影像的水体识别阈值和精度进行比较,进而分析两类影像的归一化水体指数的相互定量关系。
结果表明:1)从水体识别阈值看,高分一号影像的水体混合像元NDWI 值多在0.6$\sim$0.8之间,水体的NDWI值
大多为1.0,而Landsat8的水体混合像元NDWI值在-0.2$\sim$0之间,水体的NDWI值多为0以上; 2)从识别
精度而言,在河谷地带和山区,高分一号影像都明显优于Landsat8,特别是对混合水体混合像元的识别,
高分一号影像有比较好的优势; 3)两类影像NDWI值具有一定的线性关系,但定量回归结果不太理想。
高分一号和Landsat8在喀斯特地区水体识别的山地地带和河谷地带都有较好的效果,但高分一号的的估算精度和效果都优于Landsat8。

关键词: 喀斯特地区;高分一号, Landsat8;归一化水体指数

Abstract: Youjiang River Valley in Tianyang County of Baise
City, Guangxi, China, is taken as the research sample area, and the normalized differencewater index (NDWI) of remote
sensing images of GF-1 and Landsat8 for this Karst area is quantitatively analyzed to provide important
scientific support for the study of Karst water resources. Specifically, the valley basins and
Karst rocky mountains in the Karst valley are selected as the study areas. Firstly, the normalized
water index (NDWI) of the two types of remote sensing images are calculated respectively. Then
combined with visual interpretation, the accuracy of water body identification and normalized
water body index of the two types of images are compared. At last,the quantitative relationship
between normalized water index of images is quantitatively analyzed and compared. The results
show that the high-resolution images of GF-1 are superior to those of Landsat8 in valley and
mountain areas, especially for the recognition of mixed directional elements. As for the
threshold of water identification, the mixed pixels of high-resolution images are mostly
between 0.6 and 0.8, and the NDWI values of water bodies are mostly around 1.0. The mixed
pixels of Landsat8 are in the range of $-0.2\sim$0, and the NDWI value of water body is more than 0.
In addition, the NDWI values of the two images have a certain linear relationship, but the
quantitative regression results are not so satisfactory. It seems that both GF-1 and Landsat8
are qualified for identifying mountain topography and valley zones in Karst area, however,
the estimafion accuracy and effect of GF-1 are better than Landsat8.

Key words: Karst area, GF-1, Landsat8, normalized difference water index

陈思源, 陆丹丹, 吴水亭. 喀斯特地区的高分一号与Landsat8遥感影像归一化水体指数定量比较[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2020, 15(2): 125-133.

参考文献 0

	[1]
	Zhang Yi, Chen Chengzhong, Wu Guiping, et al. The influence of spatial resolution changes of remote
	sensing images on the accuracy of lake water extraction [J]. Lake Science, 2015, 27(2): 335-342 (in Chinese).
	张毅,陈成忠,吴桂平等.遥感影像空间分辨率变化对湖泊水体提取精度的影响[J].湖泊科学, 2015, 27(2): 335-342.
	[2]
	Wu Zhijie, Huang Shaolin, Fu Jiaofeng. Interactive comparison of water body indices of multi-source
	remote sensing images [J]. Surveying and mapping science, 2016, 41(11): 194-199 (in Chinese).
	吴志杰,黄绍霖,傅娇凤.多源遥感影像水体指数的交互对比[J].测绘科学, 2016, 41(11): 194-199.
	[3]
	XuHanqiu, Zhang Tiejun, Huang Shaolin, Landsat-7 ETM + and ASTER building index [J].
	Geographic study, 2013, 32(7): 1336-1344 (in Chinese).
	徐涵秋,张铁军,黄绍霖.Landsat-7 ETM＋与ASTER建筑指数的定量比较[J].地理研究, 2013, 32(7): 1336-1344.
	[4]
	Ma Xiaoli, Wang Xingfeng, Chen Ming, et al. Analysis of vegetation cover change in Shendong mining area
	based on vegetation index [J]. Anhui Agricultural Science, 2011, 39(21): 12795-12796 (in Chinese).
	马晓黎,王行风,陈明,等.基于植被指数的神东矿区植被盖度变化分析[J].安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(21): 12795-12796.
	[5]
	Wu Zhijie, Huang Shaolin, Fu Jiaofeng. Interactive comparison of water body indices of multi-source remote sensing images [J].
	Surveying and mapping science, 2016, 41(11): 194-199 (in Chinese).
	吴志杰,黄绍霖,傅娇凤.多源遥感影像水体指数的交互对比[J].测绘科学, 2016, 41(11): 194-199.
	[6]
	Xing Yuanjun, Liu Xiaonong, Song Yabin, et al. Comparison and analysis of high resolution remote
	sensing image fusion methods made in China [J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry Science
	and Technology, 2016, 36(10): 83-88(in Chinese).
	邢元军,刘晓农,宋亚斌,等.国产高分辨率遥感影像融合方法比较与分析[J].中南林业科技大学学报, 2016, 36(10): 83-88.
	[7]
	Jiang Youyan, Han Tao, Xu Yan, et al. Comparison of three drought remote sensing monitoring effects
	based on Multi-source Satellite Data [J]. Agricultural Research in Arid Areas, 2014, 32(2): 47-51 (in Chinese).
	蒋友严,韩涛,徐燕,等.基于多源卫星数据的3种干旱遥感监测效果比较[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2014, 32(2): 47-51.
	[8]
	JiaYuqiu, Li Bing, Cheng Yongzheng, et al. Comparison of LAI inversion of Maize Based on
	GF-1 and Landsat-8 multispectral remote sensing images [J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(9): 173-179 (in Chinese).
	贾玉秋,李冰,程永政,等.基于GF-1与Landsat-8多光谱遥感影像的玉米LAI反演比较[J].农业工程学报, 2015, 31(9): 173-179.
	[9]
	Zhang Tiejun, XuHanqiu. A comparative study of the interaction between ASTER and ETM + images based on
	MNDWI water index [J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2010 (4): 1244-1252 (in Chinese).
	张铁军,徐涵秋.基于MNDWI水体指数的ASTER与ETM＋影像交互比较研究[J].宇航学报, 2010(4): 1244-1252.
	[10]
	Qiao Cheng, Luo Jiancheng, Shen Zhanfeng, et al. End-element matched adaptive spectral characterization of
	remote sensing images [J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Wave, 2012, 31(5): 449-454 (in Chinese).
	乔程,骆剑承,沈占锋,等.端元匹配的遥感影像地物自适应光谱表征[J].红外与毫米波学报, 2012, 31(5): 449-454.
	[11]
	Huang Yongxi, Li Xiaosong, Wu Bingfang, et al. Research on improved ESTARFM data fusion method [J].
	Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 2013, 28(5): 753-760 (in Chinese).
	黄永喜,李晓松,吴炳方,等.基于改进的ESTARFM数据融合方法研究[J].遥感技术与应用, 2013, 28(5): 753-760.
	[12]
	Wu Zhijie, Huang Shaolin, Fu Jiaofeng. Interactive comparison of water index of multi-source remote sensing
	images [J]. Surveying and mapping science, 2016, 41(11): 194-199 (in Chinese).
	吴志杰,黄绍霖,傅娇凤.多源遥感影像水体指数的交互对比[J].测绘科学, 2016, 41(11):194-199.
	[13]
	Wang Limin, Liu Jia, Yang Fugang, et al. Early identification of winter wheat area based on GF-1 satellite
	remote sensing [J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(11): 194-201 (in Chinese).
	王利民,刘佳,杨福刚,等.基于GF-1卫星遥感的冬小麦面积早期识别[J].农业工程学报, 2015, 31(11): 194-201.
	[14]
	Wu Junjun. Study on quantitative extraction and evaluation method of desertification land by remote sensing [D].
	Beijing: Doctoral Dissertation of Chinese Academy of Forestry Sciences, 2015 (in Chinese).
	吴俊君. 沙化土地遥感定量提取与评价方法研究[D].北京：中国林业科学研究院博士学位论文, 2015.
	[15]
	Charlie, Gong Huili, Hu Zhuowei, et al. Comparative study on water body information extraction from
	high-score images [J]. Journal of Capital Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 36(04): 85-89 (in Chinese).
	查力,宫辉力,胡卓玮等.高分影像水体信息提取对比研究[J].首都师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 36(04): 85-89.
	[16]
	Xu Tao, Tan Zongkun, Yan Xiaoping. Object-oriented urban water information extraction method [J].
	Geospatial information, 2010, 8(03): 64-66 (in Chinese).
	徐涛,谭宗坤,闫小平.面向对象的城市水体信息提取方法[J].地理空间信息, 2010, 8(03): 64-66.
	[17]
	Chen Peng, Zhang Qing, Li Qian. A comparative analysis of several commonly used extraction methods based
	on FY3A/MERSI images [J]. Arid Region Geography, 2015, 38(04): 770-778 (in Chinese).
	陈鹏,张青,李倩.基于FY3A/MERSI影像的几种常用水体提取方法的比较分析[J].干旱区地理, 2015, 38(04): 770-778.
	[18]
	Xu Hanqiu, Zhang Tiejun. ASTER and Landsat ETM + vegetation index [J].
	Spectroscopy and spectral analysis, 2011, 31(07): 1902-1907 (in Chinese).
	徐涵秋,张铁军.ASTER与Landsat ETM+植被指数的交互比较[J].光谱学与光谱分析, 2011, 31(07): 1902-1907.