成都春季复合污染下PM2:5 的化学消光贡献

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨复合污染条件下气溶胶的消光特性, 选取成都市 O3 与 PM2:5 同步污染的春季开展气溶胶组分与消光特性观测, 并结合美国 IMPROVE 化学消光算法研究了组成与消光特征的关系。结果表明, 2018 年春季成都 PM2:5 平均浓度与散射系数 bsp 分别为 (50.3±22.4) µg·m−3 和 (237.5±140.2) Mm−1, 且二者均呈现“单峰单谷”的日变化趋势; 大气气溶胶的消光系数为 (268.4±153.7) Mm−1, 对其贡献最大的组分是 NH4NO3 (26.0%) 和有机物 (OM) (24.4%)。分析表明在 PM2:5 与 O3 复合污染情况下, 二次污染组分 SNA (SO42−、 NO3−、 NH4+ 三者之和)、二次有机碳 (SOC) 的含量显著增加, 与清洁天相比分别升高了 1.0 和 1.3 倍; OM 成为最大消光贡献者 (32.2%), 其次是 NH4NO3 和 (NH4)2SO4, 分别贡献 22.8% 和 20.5%。因此, 进一步减少气态前体物如 SO2、 NOx、 NH3 和 VOCs 的排放可以有效改善成都地区空气质量和能见度。

关键词: 化学消光, 复合污染, PM2:5, 成都

Abstract: To explore the aerosol chemical extinction during complex air pollution, a field campaign was carried out to investigate the composition and extinction characteristics of PM2:5 in spring when O3 and PM2:5 combined pollution occurred in Chengdu, China, and the relationship between chemical composition and extinction characteristics was studied using the chemical extinction algorithm proposed by IMPROVE in the United States. The results showed that the average concentration of PM2:5 and scattering coefficient bsp in the spring of 2018 in Chengdu were (50.3±22.4) µg·m−3 and (237.5±140.2) Mm−1, respectively, and both of them showed the similar diurnal variation trend with “single peak and single valley”. The extinction coefficient of spring PM2:5 in Chengdu was (268.4±153.7) Mm−1, and the chemical components that contributed the most to it were NH4NO3 (26.0%) and organic matter (OM) (24.4%). In the case of PM2:5 and O3 combined pollution, the mass of secondary pollution components (SNA, the sum of SO42−, NO3−, NH4+) and secondary organic carbon (SOC) increased significantly, which increased by 1.0 and 1.3 times respectively compared with the clean day, and OM became the largest extinction contributor (32.2%), followed by NH4NO3 and (NH4)2SO4, contributing 22.8% and 20.5% respectively. Therefore, it is shown that further reducing the emission of precursor gases such as SO2, NOx, NH3 and VOCs may be efficient to improve the air quality and visibility in Chengdu district.

Key words: chemical extinction, complex air pollution, PM2:5, Chengdu

中图分类号:

X513

罗琼, 冯淼, 宋丹林, 周力∗, 陆成伟, 杨复沫, . 成都春季复合污染下PM2:5 的化学消光贡献[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2022, 17(1): 148-159.

LUO Qiong, FENG Miao, SONG Danlin, ZHOU Li∗, LU Chengwei, YANG Fumo, . Contribution of PM2:5 to chemical extinction under combined pollution during spring in Chengdu[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, 2022, 17(1): 148-159.

参考文献 44

[1]	贺克斌, 杨复沫, 段凤魁, 等. 大气颗粒物与区域复合污染 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011: 39-45.
[2]	Lepeule J, Laden F, Dockery D, et al. Chronic exposure to fine particles and mortality: An extended follow-up of the Harvard
	Six Cities study from 1974 to 2009 [J]. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2012, 120(7): 965-970.
[3]	Liu B S, Wu J H, Wang J, et al. Chemical characteristics and sources of ambient PM2:5 in a harbor area: Quantification of
	health risks to workers from source-specific selected toxic elements [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 268: 115926.
[4]	Wu D. Hazy weather research in China in the last decade: A review [J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2012, 32(2): 257-269.
	吴兑. 近十年中国灰霾天气研究综述 [J]. 环境科学学报, 2012, 32(2): 257-269.
[5]	Zhang X Y, Sun J Y, Wang Y Q, et al. Factors contributing to haze and fog in China [J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2013,
58	(13): 1178-1187.
	张小曳, 孙俊英, 王亚强, 等. 我国雾-霾成因及其治理的思考 [J]. 科学通报, 2013, 58(13): 1178-1187.
[6]	Tao J, Zhang L M, Cao J J, et al. A review of current knowledge concerning PM2:5 chemical composition, aerosol optical
	properties and their relationships across China [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2017, 17(15): 9485-9518.
[7]	Zhang Q, Zheng Y X, Tong D, et al. Drivers of improved PM2:5 air quality in China from 2013 to 2017 [J]. PNAS, 2019,
11	6(49): 24463-24469.
[8]	Zhang N N, Ma F, Qin C B, et al. Spatiotemporal trends in PM2:5 levels from 2013 to 2017 and regional demarcations for joint
	prevention and control of atmospheric pollution in China [J]. Chemosphere, 2018, 210: 1176-1184.
[9]	Wang J D, Zhao B, Wang S X, et al. Particulate matter pollution over China and the effects of control policies [J]. Science of
	the Total Environment, 2017, 584/585: 426-447.
[10]	Li K, Jacob D J, Liao H, et al. Anthropogenic drivers of 2013-2017 trends in summer surface ozone in China [J]. Proceedings
	of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019, 116(2): 422-427.
[11]	Wang H B, Tian M, Chen Y, et al. Seasonal characteristics, formation mechanisms and source origins of PM2:5 in two megacities
	in Sichuan Basin, China [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2018, 18(2): 865-881.
[12]	Tian M, Wang H B, Chen Y, et al. Highly time-resolved characterization of water-soluble inorganic ions in PM2:5 in a humid
	and acidic mega city in Sichuan Basin, China [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 580: 224-234.
[13]	Zhang R, Jing J, Tao J, et al. Chemical characterization and source apportionment of PM2:5 in Beijing: Seasonal perspective
[J]	Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2013, 13(14): 7053-7074.
[14]	Peng J F, Hu M, Shang D J, et al. Explosive secondary aerosol formation during severe haze in the North China Plain [J].
	Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 55(4): 2189-2207.
[15]	Tian M, Wang H B, Chen Y, et al. Characteristics of aerosol pollution during heavy haze events in Suzhou, China [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2016, 16(11): 7357-7371.
[16]	Tian J, Wang Q Y, Zhang Y, et al. Impacts of primary emissions and secondary aerosol formation on air pollution in an urban
	area of China during the COVID-19 lockdown [J]. Environment International, 2021, 150: 106426.
[17]	Tian J, Wang Q Y, Han Y M, et al. Contributions of aerosol composition and sources to particulate optical properties in a
	southern coastal city of China [J]. Atmospheric Research, 2020, 235: 104744.
[18]	Zhou Y Q, Wang Q Y, Zhang X, et al. Exploring the impact of chemical composition on aerosol light extinction during winter
	in a heavily polluted urban area of China [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 247: 766-775.
[19]	Jiang L, Zhang Z F, Zhu B, et al. Comparison of parameterizations for the atmospheric extinction coefficient in Lin′an, China
[J]	Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 621: 507-515.
[20]	Wang J, Zhang Y F, Feng Y C, et al. Characterization and source apportionment of aerosol light extinction with a coupled
	model of CMB-IMPROVE in Hangzhou, Yangtze River Delta of China [J]. Atmospheric Research, 2016, 178: 570-579.
[21]	Li L W, Xiao Z M, Yang N, et al. Extinction characteristics of aerosols and the contribution of pollution sources to light
	extinction during three heavy pollution episodes in the winter of 2020 in Tianjin [J]. Environmental Science, 2021, 42(9):
41	58-4167.
	李立伟, 肖致美, 杨宁, 等. 天津市 2020 年冬季重污染过程气溶胶消光特性及其来源 [J]. 环境科学, 2021, 42(9):
	58-4167.
[22]	Tao J, Zhang L M, Gao J, et al. Aerosol chemical composition and light scattering during a winter season in Beijing [J].
	Atmospheric Environment, 2015, 110: 36-44.
[23]	Pitchford M, Malm W, Schichtel B, et al. Revised algorithm for estimating light extinction from IMPROVE particle speciation
	data [J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2007, 57(11): 1326-1336.
[24]	Bergin M H, Cass G R, Xu J, et al. Aerosol radiative, physical, and chemical properties in Beijing during June 1999 [J]. Journal
	of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2001, 106(D16): 17969-17980.
[25]	Watson J G, Chow J C, Lowenthal D H, et al. Estimating aerosol light scattering at the Fresno Supersite [J]. Atmospheric
	Environment, 2008, 42(6): 1186-1196.
[26]	Tao J, Zhang L M, Cao J J, et al. Characterization and source apportionment of aerosol light extinction in Chengdu, southwest
	China [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2014, 95: 552-562.
[27]	Wang H B, Shi G M, Tian M, et al. Aerosol optical properties and chemical composition apportionment in Sichuan Basin,
	China [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 577: 245-257.
[28]	Ma Q X, Wu Y F, Fu S L, et al. Pollution severity-dependent aerosol light scattering enhanced by inorganic species formation
	in Beijing haze [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 719: 137545.
[29]	Xia L, Zhu B, Wang H L, et al. Source apportionment and optical properties of fine particles associated with regional pollution
	in the Yangtze River Delta [J]. Environmental Science, 2021, 42(2): 556-563.
	夏丽, 朱彬, 王红磊, 等. 长三角地区一次区域污染过程中细颗粒物的来源解析及其光学特性 [J]. 环境科学, 2021,
42	(2): 556-563.
[30]	Hu Y J, Liu Z H. Study on the relationship between atmospheric extinction coefficient and mass concentration of PM2:5 under
	different humidity in Chengdu [J]. Sichuan Environment, 2017, 36(5): 82-88.
	胡云佳, 刘志红. 成都市大气消光系数及 PM2:5 质量浓度在不同湿度条件下的关系研究 [J]. 四川环境, 2017, 36(5):
82	-88.
[31]	Yang Y S, Ni C J, Deng Y, et al. Characteristics of atmospheric extinction coefficient and its components in winter in Chengdu
[J]	Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2019, 39(5): 1425-1432.
	杨寅山, 倪长健, 邓也, 等. 成都市冬季大气消光系数及其组成的特征研究 [J]. 环境科学学报, 2019, 39(5): 1425-1432.
[32]	Miao Y C, Che H Z, Zhang X Y, et al. Relationship between summertime concurring PM2:5 and O3 pollution and boundary
	layer height differs between Beijing and Shanghai, China [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 268: 115775.
[33]	Dai H B, Zhu J, Liao H, et al. Co-occurrence of ozone and PM2:5 pollution in the Yangtze River Delta over 2013-2019:
	Spatiotemporal distribution and meteorological conditions [J]. Atmospheric Research, 2021, 249: 105363.
[34]	Malm W C, Day D E. Estimates of aerosol species scattering characteristics as a function of relative humidity [J]. Atmospheric
	Environment, 2001, 35(16): 2845-2860.
[35]	Tao J, Gao J, Zhang L M, et al. PM2:5 pollution in a megacity of southwest China: Source apportionment and implication [J].
	Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2014, 14(16): 8679-8699.
[36]	Koschmieder H. Theorie der horizontalen Sichtweite [J]. Beitrage zur Physik der freien Atmosph ¨ are ¨ , 1924, 12: 33-53.
[37]	成都市环境保护局. 成都市 2017 年环境空气质量公报 [R]. 成都: 2018.
[38]	Deng J J, Zhang Y R, Hong Y W, et al. Optical properties of PM2:5 and the impacts of chemical compositions in the coastal
	city Xiamen in China [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 557/558: 665-675.
[39]	Li Y G, Huang H X H, Griffith S M, et al. Quantifying the relationship between visibility degradation and PM2:5 constituents at
	a suburban site in Hong Kong: Differentiating contributions from hydrophilic and hydrophobic organic compounds [J]. Science
	of the Total Environment, 2017, 575: 1571-1581.
[40]	Liao W J, Zhou J B, Zhu S J, et al. Characterization of aerosol chemical composition and the reconstruction of light extinction
	coefficients during winter in Wuhan, China [J]. Chemosphere, 2020, 241: 125033.
[41]	Zhang L Y, Qiao L P, Lan J, et al. Three-years monitoring of PM2:5 and scattering coefficients in Shanghai, China [J]. Chemosphere, 2020, 253: 126613.
[42]	Tian M, Liu Y, Yang F M, et al. Increasing importance of nitrate formation for heavy aerosol pollution in two megacities in
	Sichuan Basin, southwest China [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2019, 250: 898-905.
[43]	Bai D P, Wang H L, Tan Y, et al. Optical properties of aerosols and chemical composition apportionment under different
	pollution levels in Wuhan during January 2018 [J]. Atmosphere, 2020, 11(1): 17.
[44]	Arimoto R, Duce R A, Savoie D L, et al. Relationships among aerosol constituents from Asia and the north Pacific during
	PEM-west A [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1996, 101(D1): 2011-2023.