大气与环境光学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (3): 353-366.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6141.2026.03.001

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

碳质气溶胶来源解析及健康效应研究综述

李小飞 1,2,3*, 郭景宁 1, 张蕊 1, 余锋 1,4, 杨雯 1, 李昂 1, 高飞 1   

  1. 1 陕西科技大学环境科学与工程学院工业污染控制与环境健康陕西省高等学校重点实验室, 陕西 西安 710021; 2 陕西省河流湿地生态与环境重点实验室, 陕西 渭南 714099; 3 中国科学院地球环境研究所黄土科学全国重点实验室, 陕西 西安 710061; 4 重庆交通大学河海学院, 重庆 400074
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-13 修回日期:2024-01-03 接受日期:2024-01-08 出版日期:2026-05-28 发布日期:2026-05-28
  • 通讯作者: E-mail: lixiaofei@sust.edu.cn E-mail:lixiaofei@ieecas.cn
  • 作者简介:李小飞 (1985- ), 陕西蓝田人, 博士, 副教授, 硕士生导师, 主要从事碳质气溶胶污染特征及来源解析方面的研究。 E-mail: lixiaofei@sust.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目 (42177366), 陕西省河流湿地生态与环境重点实验室项目 (SXSD202403), 中国科学院地球环境研究所黄土科学全 国重点实验室项目 (SKLLQG2133, SKLLQG2432), 咸阳市科技计划项目 (L2025-ZDYF-ZYST-005), 陕西省教育厅重点科学研究计划项 目 (25JS018)

Review of source analysis and health effects of carbonaceous aerosols

LI Xiaofei1,2,3*, GUO Jingning1, ZHANG Rui1, YU Feng1,4, YANG Wen1, LI Ang1, GAO Fei1   

  1. 1 Shaanxi University Key Laboratory of Industrial Pollution Control and Environmental Health, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710021, China; 2 Key Laboratory for Ecology and Environment of River Wetlands in Shaanxi Province, Weinan 714099, China; 3 State Key Laboratory of Loess Science, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an 710061, China; 4 School of River and Ocean Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
  • Received:2023-11-13 Revised:2024-01-03 Accepted:2024-01-08 Online:2026-05-28 Published:2026-05-28
  • Contact: Xiao-Fei LI E-mail:lixiaofei@ieecas.cn

摘要: 基于碳质气溶胶在全球碳循环中的重要性以及由此带来的环境、气候与健康效应, 本文对碳质气溶胶的来源、 源解析方法以及健康效应进行了系统综述。含碳气溶胶在全球碳循环中扮演着重要角色, 大气中的碳储量约 730 Gt C, 同时黑碳作为惰性有机碳库的重要组成部分, 广泛参与全球碳循环。碳质气溶胶的来源非常复杂, 其源解 析的主要方法包括源受体模型法、传输模型法和特征比值法, 每种方法各有优缺点, 在进行源解析时, 需依据实际情 况选择合适的源解析方法。碳质气溶胶的健康效应体现在对呼吸系统、神经系统、心血管系统和免疫系统的影响, 可 诱发哮喘、过敏性气道炎、认知能力受损、心律失常、动脉粥样硬化等一系列疾病。

关键词: 碳质气溶胶, 碳循环, 来源, 源解析, 健康效应

Abstract: Significance  Although there are extensive research on carbonaceous aerosols, such as organic carbon (OC) and black carbon (BC), there still remains a lack of systematic overview regarding their sources and source apportionment methods, especially summary of their health impacts. Given the critical role of carbonaceous aerosols in the global carbon cycle and the complexity of their sources and health effects, this review examines their origins, source apportionment methodologies, and health consequences to provide scientific foundations for carbonaceous aerosol emission reduction and pollution control strategies. Progress  Carbonaceous aerosols play a critical role in the global carbon cycle, with an atmospheric carbon storage of about 730 Gt C. Meanwhile, as an important component of the inert organic carbon pool, BC is widely involved in the global carbon cycle. Due to the extremely complex sources of carbonaceous aerosols, there are various methods for their source apportionment, including source receptor models, transport models, and feature ratio methods, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, an appropriate source analysis method should be selected according to the actual situations during the source analysis for carbonaceous aerosols. The source receptor modeling approaches involve analyzing data or meteorological parameters to identify their origins. Common methodologies include Chemical Mass Balance (CMB), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and Positive Definite Matrix Factor (PMF) Analysis. Among them, PMF models should be prioritized for scenarios where pollutant emission characteristics remain unknown and large datasets are available. The transport model approaches commonly employ two methodologies: Potential Source Contribution Factor (PSCF) and Analysis and Concentration Weighted Trajectory (CWT) Analysis . While these methods can identify specific source regions of polluted air masses, their inherent uncertainty as conditional probability analysis techniques remains significant. To mitigate this limitation, a weighting coefficient W is usually added in practical applications, resulting in Weighted Potential Source Contribution (WPSCF) Analysis and Weighted Concentration Weighted Trajectory (WCWT) Analysis to reduce analysis uncertainty. In addition, the OC/EC ratio method is commonly used to preliminarily determine the sources of carbonaceous aerosols by analyzing the proportional relationships of certain carbon components in pollutant emissions. The health impacts of carbonaceous aerosols are primarily manifested as their adverse effects on the respiratory system, nervous system, cardiovascular system, and immune system, which can induce asthma, allergic airway inflammation, cognitive impairment, arrhythmia, atherosclerosis, and other diseases. As an irritant particulate matter, BC can enter the human body through respiration. Once deposited in the respiratory tract, BC can act as a carrier for other antigens (e. g., polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heavy metals) or directly induce inflammatory damage, which in turn triggers specific immune responses. In these responses, antibodies or sensitized lymphocytes react with antigens, leading to tissue cell damage and the release of biochemically active substances. This change can cause metabolic dysfunction, followed by inflammatory reactions, resulting in persistent airway injury and inducing asthma. The primary mechanism by which BC affects the nervous system is by influencing the levels of perivascular macrophages in the central nervous system. In addition, airborne pollutants can induce inflammation and oxidative stress responses in the lungs, which subsequently triggers systemic inflammation and adversely affects cardiovascular health. And there is also a correlation between air pollution (including BC) and increased risk of lung cancer. Conclusions and Prospects Based on this review, the following conclusions and prospects are proposed for the future research directions of carbonaceous aerosols: 1) As a crucial component of inert carbon reservoirs, BC plays a significant role in the global carbon cycle. However, limited research has led to uncertainties regarding certain carbon storage and fluxes, including BC fluxes entering oceans through groundwater runoff, atmospheric carbon release from soil via respiration, erosion, and weathering processes, as well as atmospheric carbon storage capacity. These fields represent key research priorities for future breakthroughs. Currently, studies on carbon cycle and carbon sink have entered a new developmental phase, with a focus on investigating continental and marine carbon cycles on a global scale and over an extended time frame. 2) Investigating the degradation processes, degradation rates and roles of carbonaceous materials in the global carbon cycle is of great significance. Concurrently, comprehensive surveys must be conducted across different regions (e.g., urban areas, remote mountainous regions, forests, oceans) to establish regional and even global carbonaceous material databases. 3) A comprehensive understanding of the origins of carbonaceous aerosols can provide scientific guidance for energy conservation, emission reduction, and pollution control measures. And it is essential to master various source apportionment methods, including their advantages and limitations, and choose the appropriate methodology based on practical research requirements. 4) Due to their complex structures, OC and BC can adsorb toxic and harmful substances such as heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Current research has not yet achieved complete separation between carbon materials and the toxic substances adsorbed on their surfaces, nor can it determine which chemical components pose greater risks to human health. Therefore, further studies are required to elucidate the independent pathogenic mechanisms of carbonaceous materials and to conduct systematic, comprehensive quantitative assessments of their impacts on human health.

Key words: carbonaceous aerosols, carbon cycle, sources, source apportionment, health effects

中图分类号: