纳米颗粒物化学成分测量技术及其应用
	#br#

大气与环境光学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (6): 402-412.

• “纳米颗粒物在线测量技术”专辑 • 上一篇下一篇

纳米颗粒物化学成分测量技术及其应用 #br#

陈岩1;2, 王炜罡1;2∗, 刘明元1;2, 葛茂发1;2

1 中国科学院化学研究所北京分子科学国家研究中心分子动态与稳态结构国家重点实验室, 北京 100190; 2 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2020-09-01 修回日期:2020-10-11 出版日期:2020-11-28 发布日期:2020-12-10
通讯作者: E-mail: gemaofa@iccas.ac.cn E-mail:wangwg@iccas.ac.cn
作者简介:陈岩 (1996- ), 山东邹城人, 博士研究生, 主要从事纳米颗粒物方面的研究。 E-mail: vrgchenyan@iccas.ac.cn
基金资助:
Supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (国家重点研发计划, 2017YFC0209500), National Natural Science Foundation of China (国家自然科学基金项目, 41822703)

Measurement Technologies of Nanoparticle Chemical Composition and Their Application #br#

Chen Yan1;2, Wang Weigang1;2∗, Liu Mingyuan1;2, Ge Maofa1;2

1 State Key Laboratory for Structural Chemistry of Unstable and Stable Species, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, CAS Research/Education Center for Excellence in Molecular Sciences, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2020-09-01 Revised:2020-10-11 Published:2020-11-28 Online:2020-12-10
Contact: Weigang Wang E-mail:wangwg@iccas.ac.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 纳米颗粒物是大气颗粒物的重要组成部分, 对大气环境、气候变化以及人群健康有着重要的影响。纳米颗粒物物理化学特性, 特别是化学组成, 在其中起着重要的作用。总结了国内外主要的纳米颗粒物化学成分测量技术, 重点介绍了不同测量技术的工作原理和相关仪器的典型结构, 并结合大气环境研究中的应用实例, 分析了不同测量技术的应用范围及优缺点, 最后展望了纳米颗粒物测量技术及应用的发展方向。

关键词: 纳米颗粒物, 测量技术, 化学成分, 外场, 实验室

Abstract: As an important part of atmospheric particulate matter, nanoparticles have a significant impact on human health, atmospheric environment, as well as climate. The physical and chemical properties of nanoparticles, especially the chemical compositions, play an important role in these effects. This review surveys the various analytical techniques at home and abroad used to measure airborne nanoparticles. For each technique, its operation principle and typical instrument configuration are summarized, and representative examples reported in previous work are also introduced to illustrate its advantages and disadvantages. In addition, the future directions of instrumental development and application are outlined and discussed.

Key words: nanoparticle, measurement method, chemical composition, field campaign, laboratory experiment

中图分类号:

O648.18

陈岩, 王炜罡, ∗, 刘明元, 葛茂发, . 纳米颗粒物化学成分测量技术及其应用 #br#[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2020, 15(6): 402-412.

Chen Yan, Wang Weigang, ∗, Liu Mingyuan, Ge Maofa, . Measurement Technologies of Nanoparticle Chemical Composition and Their Application #br# [J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, 2020, 15(6): 402-412.

参考文献 14

[1]	Heal M R, Kumar P, Harrison R M. Particles, air quality, policy and health [J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2012, 41(19):
66	06-6630.
[2]	Hu D W, Chen J M, Ye X N, et al. Hygroscopicity and evaporation of ammonium chloride and ammonium nitrate: Relative
	humidity and size effects on the growth factor [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2011, 45(14): 2349-2355.
[3]	Warheit D B, Sayes C M, Reed K L, et al. Health effects related to nanoparticle exposures: Environmental, health and safety
	considerations for assessing hazards and risks [J]. Pharmacology & therapeutics, 2008, 120(1): 35-42.
[4]	Kerminen V M, Chen X M, Vakkari Ville, et al. Atmospheric new particle formation and growth: Review of field observations
[J]	Environmental Research Letters, 2018, 13(10): 103003.
[5]	Kumar P, Pirjola L, Ketzel M, et al. Nanoparticle emissions from 11 non-vehicle exhaust sources-A review [J]. Atmospheric
	Environment, 2013, 67: 252-277.
[6]	Liu P, Ziemann P J, Kittelson D B, et al. Generating particle beams of controlled dimensions and divergence: I. theory of
	particle motion in aerodynamic lenses and nozzle expansions [J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 1995, 22(3): 293-313.
[7]	Liu P, Ziemann P J, Kittelson D B, et al. Generating particle beams of controlled dimensions and divergence: II. experimental
	evaluation of particle motion in aerodynamic lenses and nozzle expansions [J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 1995, 22(3):
31	4-324.
[8]	Wang X L, Kruis F E, Mcmurry P H. Aerodynamic focusing of nanoparticles: I. guidelines for designing aerodynamic lenses
	for nanoparticles [J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2005, 39(7): 611-623.
[9]	Wang X L, Gidwani A, Girshick S L, et al. Aerodynamic focusing of nanoparticles: II. numerical simulation of particle motion
	through aerodynamic lenses [J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2005, 39(7): 624-636.
[10]	Lee K S, Kim S, Lee D. Aerodynamic focusing of 5-50nm nanoparticles in air [J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2009, 40(12):
10	10-1018.
[11]	Jayne J T, Leard D C, Zhang X F, et al. Development of an aerosol mass spectrometer for size and composition analysis of
	submicron particles [J]. Aerosol Science & Technology, 2000, 33(1): 49-70.
[12]	Decarlo P F, Kimmel J R, Trimborn A, et al. Field-deployable, high-resolution, time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer [J].
	Analytical Chemistry, 2006, 78(24): 8281-8289.
[13]	Kenseth C M, Petrucci G A. Characterization of a bipolar near-infrared laser desorption/ionization aerosol mass spectrometer
[J]	Aerosol Science and Technology, 2016, 50(8): 790-801.
[14]	Li Y J, Sun Y L, Zhang Q, et al. Real-time chemical characterization of atmospheric particulate matter in China: A review [J].
	Atmospheric Environment, 2017, 158: 270-304.
[15]	Zelenyuk A, Imre D, Wilson J, et al. Airborne single particle mass spectrometers (SPLAT II & miniSPLAT) and new software
	for data visualization and analysis in a geo-spatial context [J]. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2015,
26	(2): 257-270.
[16]	Zelenyuk A, Yang J, Imre D. Comparison between mass spectra of individual organic particles generated by UV laser ablation
	and in the IR/UV two-step mode [J]. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 2009, 282(1-2): 6-12.
[17]	Zelenyuk A, Yang J, Imre D, et al. Achieving size independent hit-rate in single particle mass spectrometry [J]. Aerosol Science
	and Technology, 2009, 43(4): 305-310.
[18]	Zauscher M D, Moore M J, Lewis G S, et al. Approach for measuring the chemistry of individual particles in the size range
	critical for cloud formation [J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2011, 83(6): 2271-2278.
[19]	Voisin D, Smith J N, Sakurai H, et al. Thermal desorption chemical ionization mass spectrometer for ultrafine particle chemical
	composition [J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2003, 37(6): 471-475.
[20]	Zhang R Y, Wang L, Khalizov A F, et al. Formation of nanoparticles of blue haze enhanced by anthropogenic pollution [J].
	Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009, 106(42): 17650.
[21]	Chen X T, Jiang J K, Chen D R. A soft X-ray unipolar charger for ultrafine particles [J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2019, 133:
66	-71.
[22]	Kreisberg N M, Spielman S R, Eiguren-Fernandez A, et al. Water condensation-based nanoparticle charging system: Physical
	and chemical characterization [J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2018, 52(10): 1167-1177.
[23]	Yuan B., Koss A R, Warneke C, et al. Proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry: Applications in atmospheric sciences [J].
	Chemical Reviews, 2017, 117(21): 13187-13229.
[24]	Zhao R. The recent development and application of chemical ionization mass spectrometry in atmospheric chemistry [J]. In
	Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry, 2018, 1-33.
[25]	Wang S Y, Zordan C A, Johnston M V. Chemical characterization of individual, airborne sub-10-nm particles and molecules
[J]	Analytical Chemistry, 2006, 78(6): 1750-1754.
[26]	Wang S Y, Johnston M V. Airborne nanoparticle characterization with a digital ion trap-reflectron time of flight mass spectrometer [J]. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 2006, 258(1-3): 50-57.
[27]	Horan A J, Krasnomowitz J M, Johnston M V. Particle size and chemical composition effects on elemental analysis with the
	nano aerosol mass spectrometer [J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2017, 51(10): 1135-1143.
[28]	Johnston M V, Wang S Y, Reinard M S. Nanoparticle mass spectrometry: Pushing the limit of single particle analysis [J].
	Applied spectroscopy, 2006, 60(10): 264A-272A.
[29]	Laitinen T, Hartonen K, Kuimaia M, et al. Aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometer for measuring ultrafine aerosol particles
[J]	Boreal Environment Research, 2009, 14(4): 539-549.
[30]	Gonser S, Held A. A chemical analyzer for charged ultrafine particles [J]. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2013, 6(9):
	2339.
[31]	He S, Li L, Duan H, et al. Aerosol analysis via electrostatic precipitation-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry [J].
	Analytical Chemistry, 2015, 87(13): 6752-6760.
[32]	Wagner A C, Bergen A, Brilke S, et al. Size-resolved online chemical analysis of nanoaerosol particles: A thermal desorption
	differential mobility analyzer coupled to a chemical ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer [J]. Atmospheric Measurement
	Techniques, 2018, 11(10): 5489-5506.
[33]	Chen H, Venter A, Cooks R G. Extractive electrospray ionization for direct analysis of undiluted urine, milk and other complex
	mixtures without sample preparation [J]. Chemical Communications, 2006, 19: 2042-2044.
[34]	Gallimore P J, Kalberer M. Characterizing an extractive electrospray ionization (EESI) source for the online mass spectrometry
	analysis of organic aerosols [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(13): 7324-7331.
[35]	Lopez-Hilfiker F D, Pospisilova V, Huang W, et al. An extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer
	(EESI-TOF) for online measurement of atmospheric aerosol particles [J]. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2019, 12(9):
48	67-4886.
[36]	Horan A J, Apsokardu M J, Johnston M V. Droplet assisted inlet ionization for online analysis of airborne nanoparticles [J].
	Analytical Chemistry, 2017, 89(2): 1059-1062.
[37]	Zhao J, Eisele F L, Titcombe M, et al. Chemical ionization mass spectrometric measurements of atmospheric neutral clusters
	using the cluster-CIMS [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2010, 115: D08205.
[38]	Jiang J K, Zhao J, Chen M D, et al. First measurements of neutral atmospheric cluster and 1-2 nm particle number size
	distributions during nucleation events [J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2011, 45(4): ii-v.
[39]	Lei T, Ma N, Hong J, et al. Nano-hygroscopicity tandem differential mobility analyzer (nano-HTDMA) for investigating
	hygroscopic properties of sub-10 nm aerosol nanoparticles [J]. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2020, 2020: 1-48.
[40]	Wang Z, Su H, Wang X, et al. Scanning supersaturation condensation particle counter applied as a nano-CCN counter for sizeresolved analysis of the hygroscopicity and chemical composition of nanoparticles [J]. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques,
20	15, 8(5): 2161-2172.
[41]	Li W J, Xu L, Liu X H, et al. Air pollution-aerosol interactions produce more bioavailable iron for ocean ecosystems [J].
	Science Advances, 2017, 3(3): e1601749.
[42]	Makel ¨ a J M, Ho ¨ ffmann T, Holzke C, et al. Biogenic iodine emissions and identification of end-products in coastal ultrafine
	particles during nucleation bursts [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2002, 107(D19), doi:10.1029/2001JD000580.
[43]	Chen Y Z, Shah N, Huggins F E, et al. Characterization of ambient airborne particles by energy-filtered transmission electron
	microscopy [J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2005, 39(6): 509-518.
[44]	Huang D, Hua X, Xiu G L, et al. Secondary ion mass spectrometry: The application in the analysis of atmospheric particulate
	matter [J]. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2017, 989: 1-14.
[45]	Hoppe P. NanoSIMS: A new tool in cosmochemistry [J]. Applied Surface Science, 2006, 252(19): 7102-7106.
[46]	Dazzi A, Prater C B, Hu Q C, et al. AFM-IR: Combining atomic force microscopy and infrared spectroscopy for nanoscale
	chemical characterization [J]. Applied spectroscopy, 2012, 66(12): 1365-1384.
[47]	Dazzi A, Prater C B. AFM-IR: Technology and applications in nanoscale infrared spectroscopy and chemical imaging [J].
	Chemical Reviews, 2017, 117(7): 5146-5173.
[48]	Shi X, Coca-Lopez N, Janik J, et al. Advances in tip-enhanced near-field raman microscopy using nanoantennas [J]. Chemical
	Reviews, 2017, 117(7): 4945-4960.
[49]	Gao Y, Johnston M V. Online deposition of nano-aerosol for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry [J].
	Rapid Communication Mass Spectrometry, 2009, 23(24): 3963-3968.
[50]	Smith J N, Moore K F, Mcmurry P H, et al. Atmospheric measurements of sub-20 nm diameter particle chemical composition
	by thermal desorption chemical ionization mass spectrometry [J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2004, 38(2): 100-110.
[51]	Smith J N, Moore K F, Eisele F L, et al. Chemical composition of atmospheric nanoparticles during nucleation events in
	Atlanta [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 2005, 110: D22S03.
[52]	Yao L, Garmash O, Bianchi F, et al. Atmospheric new particle formation from sulfuric acid and amines in a Chinese megacity
[J]	Science, 2018, 361(6399): 278-281.
[53]	Klems J P, Pennington M R, Zordan C A, et al. Apportionment of motor vehicle emissions from fast changes in number concentration and chemical composition of ultrafine particles near a roadway intersection [J]. Environmental Science & Technology,
20	11, 45(13): 5637-5643.
[54]	Bzdek B R, Horan A J, Pennington M R, et al. Silicon is a frequent component of atmospheric nanoparticles [J]. Environmental
	Science & Technology, 2014, 48(19): 11137-11145.
[55]	Lawler M J, Whitehead J, O’dowd C, et al. Composition of 15-85 nm particles in marine air [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and
	Physics, 2014, 14(21): 11557-11569.
[56]	Bzdek B R, Lawler M J, Horan A J, et al. Molecular constraints on particle growth during new particle formation [J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2014, 41(16): 6045-6054.
[57]	Bzdek B R, Horan A J, Pennington M R, et al. Quantitative and time-resolved nanoparticle composition measurements during
	new particle formation [J]. Faraday Discussions, 2013, 165: 25-43.
[58]	Hodshire A L, Lawler M J, Zhao J, et al. Multiple new-particle growth pathways observed at the US DOE Southern Great
	Plains field site [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2016, 16(14): 9321-9348.
[59]	Lawler M J, Rissanen M P, Ehn M, et al. Evidence for diverse biogeochemical drivers of boreal forest new particle formation
[J]	Geophysical Research Letters, 2018, 45(4): 2038-2046.
[60]	Glicker H S, Lawler M J, Ortega J, et al. Chemical composition of ultrafine aerosol particles in central Amazonia during the
	wet season [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2019, 19(20): 13053-13066.
[61]	Laitinen T, Ehn M, Junninen H, et al. Characterization of organic compounds in 10- to 50-nm aerosol particles in boreal forest
	with laser desorption-ionization aerosol mass spectrometer and comparison with other techniques [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2011, 45(22): 3711-3719.
[62]	Laitinen T, Junninen H, Parshintsev J, et al. Changes in concentration of nitrogen-containing compounds in 10 nm particles of
	boreal forest atmosphere at snowmelt [J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2014, 70: 1-10.
[63]	Lawler M J, Draper D C, Smith J N. Atmospheric fungal nanoparticle bursts [J]. Science Advances, 2020, 6(3): eaax9051.
[64]	Sinha B W, Hoppe P, Huth J, et al. Sulfur isotope analyses of individual aerosol particles in the urban aerosol at a central
	European site (Mainz, Germany) [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2008, 8(23): 7217-7238.
[65]	Ghosal S, Weber P K, Laskin A. Spatially resolved chemical imaging of individual atmospheric particles using nanoscale
	imaging mass spectrometry: Insight into particle origin and chemistry [J]. Analytical Methods, 2014, 6(8): 2444-2451.
[66]	Li K, Sinha B, Hoppe P. Speciation of nitrogen-bearing species using negative and positive secondary ion spectra with nano
	secondary ion mass spectrometry [J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2016, 88(6): 3281-3288.
[67]	Chen H H, Chee S, Lawler M J, et al. Size resolved chemical composition of nanoparticles from reactions of sulfuric acid with
	ammonia and dimethylamine [J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2018, 52(10): 1120-1133.
[68]	Or V W, Estillore A D, Tivanski A V, et al. Lab on a tip: Atomic force microscopy-photothermal infrared spectroscopy
	of atmospherically relevant organic/inorganic aerosol particles in the nanometer to micrometer size range [J]. Analyst, 2018,
14	3(12): 2765-2774.

纳米颗粒物化学成分测量技术及其应用 #br#

Measurement Technologies of Nanoparticle Chemical Composition and Their Application #br#

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 14

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张亭禄, 陈树果, 薛程. 海洋水体光学性质测量技术研究进展[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2020, 15(1): 23-39.
[2]	赵南京, 程钊, 殷高方, 马明俊, 董鸣, 王翔, 覃志松, 甘婷婷, 张小玲, 刘建国, 刘文清. 离散三维荧光光谱法海洋浮游藻类群落结构快速测量技术[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2020, 15(1): 62-71.
[3]	李珍珍张季. 典型类型气溶胶散射特性的计算分析[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2018, 13(4): 250-257.
[4]	陈杨赵卫雄徐学哲阳成强林晓晓盖艳波张为俊. 化学放大法测量大气过氧自由基的技术进展[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2017, 12(4): 241-253.
[5]	王丹谢品华胡仁志秦敏陈浩段俊朱国梁卢雪. 大气环境NO3自由基探测技术研究进展[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2015, 10(2): 102-116.