二次有机气溶胶光学特性研究进展

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 二次有机气溶胶 (SOA) 对大气能见度、辐射平衡、气候变化具有重要影响, 系统地研究不同环境因素对 SOA 光学性质的影响是大气科学研究的前沿性方向。外场观测是认知 SOA 光学性质的重要途径, 近年来新的观测仪器和模型的发展使得对 SOA 光学性质的认识更加深入。而实验室研究通过控制特定变量模拟不同条件下 SOA 的生成过程, 从机制上加深了对 SOA 光学特性的认知。综述重点关注了近年来有关经气相氧化、多相过程等途径生成的 SOA 的光学特性研究, 并分析了老化过程对 SOA 光学特性的影响, 以及外场和实验室结果的对比和联系。

关键词: 二次有机气溶胶, 光学特性, 气相氧化, 多相反应, 老化过程

Abstract: Secondary organic aerosol (SOA) plays an important role in atmospheric visibility, radiation balance and climate change. Systematic study on the influence of different environmental factors on the optical properties of SOA is a frontier of atmospheric science. Field observation is an important way to understand the optical properties of SOA, and in recent years, the development of new observation instruments and models makes the understanding of optical properties of SOA more in-depth. On the other hand, by controlling specific variables to simulate the generation process of SOA under different conditions, laboratory research deepens the understanding of optical characteristics of SOA essentially. The review mainly focuses on the research of optical properties of SOA generated by gas-phase oxidation and multiphase process in recent years, and analyzes the influence of aging process on the SOA optical properties, as well as the comparison and connection between field and laboratory results.

Key words: secondary organic aerosols, optical properties, gas-phase oxidation, heterogeneous reaction, aging

中图分类号:

项往, 王炜罡, ∗, 张文玉, 葛茂发, ∗, 李坤. 二次有机气溶胶光学特性研究进展[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2022, 17(1): 16-28.

XIANG Wang, WANG Weigang, ∗, ZHANG Wenyu, GE Maofa, ∗, LI Kun. Research progress of optical properties of secondary organic aerosols[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, 2022, 17(1): 16-28.

参考文献 66

[1]	Shrivastava M, Cappa C D, Fan J W, et al. Recent advances in understanding secondary organic aerosol: Implications for
	global climate forcing [J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 2017, 55(2): 509-559.
[2]	Tsigaridis K, Kanakidou M. The present and future of secondary organic aerosol direct forcing on climate [J]. Current Climate
	Change Reports, 2018, 4(2): 84-98.
[3]	Moise T, Flores J M, Rudich Y. Optical properties of secondary organic aerosols and their changes by chemical processes [J].
	Chemical Reviews, 2015, 115(10): 4400-4439.
[4]	Heald C L, Kroll J H. The fuel of atmospheric chemistry: Toward a complete description of reactive organic carbon [J]. Science
	Advances, 2020, 6(6): eaay8967.
[5]	George C, Ammann M, D′Anna B, et al. Heterogeneous photochemistry in the atmosphere [J]. Chemical Reviews, 2015,
11	5(10): 4218-4258.
[6]	Herrmann H, Schaefer T, Tilgner A, et al. Tropospheric aqueous-phase chemistry: Kinetics, mechanisms, and its coupling to a
	changing gas phase [J]. Chemical Reviews, 2015, 115(10): 4259-4334.
[7]	Harvey R M, Bateman A P, Jain S, et al. Optical properties of secondary organic aerosol from cis-3-hexenol and cis-3-hexenyl
	acetate: Effect of chemical composition, humidity, and phase [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(10): 4997-
	5006.
[8]	Riemer N, Ault A P, West M, et al. Aerosol mixing state: Measurements, modeling, and impacts [J]. Reviews of Geophysics,
20	19, 57(2): 187-249.
[9]	Leung K K, Schnitzler E G, Jager W, ¨ et al. Relative humidity dependence of soot aggregate restructuring induced by secondary
	organic aerosol: Effects of water on coating viscosity and surface tension [J]. Environmental Science & Technology Letters,
20	17, 4(9): 386-390.
[10]	Tao J, Zhang L M, Cao J J, et al. A review of current knowledge concerning PM2:5 chemical composition, aerosol optical
	properties and their relationships across China [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2017, 17(15): 9485-9518.
[11]	Xie M, Chen X, Hays M D, et al. Light absorption of secondary organic aerosol: Composition and contribution of nitroaromatic
	compounds [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51(20): 11607-11616.
[12]	Hodshire A L, Akherati A, Alvarado M J, et al. Aging effects on biomass burning aerosol mass and composition: A critical
	review of field and laboratory studies [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(17): 10007-10022.
[13]	Hallquist M, Wenger J C, Baltensperger U, et al. The formation, properties and impact of secondary organic aerosol: Current
	and emerging issues [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2009, 9(14): 5155-5236.
[14]	Teich M, van Pinxteren D, Wang M, et al. Contributions of nitrated aromatic compounds to the light absorption of water-soluble
	and particulate brown carbon in different atmospheric environments in Germany and China [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and
	Physics, 2017, 17(3): 1653-1672.
[15]	Laskin A, Laskin J, Nizkorodov S A. Chemistry of atmospheric brown carbon [J]. Chemical Reviews, 2015, 115(10): 4335-
	4382.
[16]	Yan J P, Wang X P, Gong P, et al. Review of brown carbon aerosols: Recent progress and perspectives [J]. Science of the Total
	Environment, 2018, 634: 1475-1485.
[17]	Jo D S, Park R J, Lee S, et al. A global simulation of brown carbon: Implications for photochemistry and direct radiative effect
[J]	Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2016, 16(5): 3413-3432.
[18]	Marais E A, Jacob D J, Turner J R, et al. Evidence of 1991–2013 decrease of biogenic secondary organic aerosol in response
	to SO2 emission controls [J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2017, 12(5): 054018.
[19]	Herbin H, Pujol O, Hubert P, et al. New approach for the determination of aerosol refractive indices-Part I: Theoretical bases
	and numerical methodology [J]. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer, 2017, 200: 311-319.
[20]	Redmond H, Thompson J E. Evaluation of a quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) for predicting mid-visible
	refractive index of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) [J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2011, 13(15): 6872-6882.
[21]	He Q F, Bluvshtein N, Segev L, et al. Evolution of the complex refractive index of secondary organic aerosols during atmospheric aging [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52(6): 3456-3465.
[22]	Peng C, Wang W G, Li K, et al. The optical properties of limonene secondary organic aerosols: The role of NO3, OH, and O3
	in the oxidation processes [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2018, 123(6): 3292-3303.
[23]	Li K, Li J L, Wang W G, et al. Effects of gas-particle partitioning on refractive index and chemical composition of m-xylene
	secondary organic aerosol [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2018, 122(12): 3250-3260.
[24]	Cai C, Marsh A, Zhang Y H, et al. Group contribution approach to predict the refractive index of pure organic components in
	ambient organic aerosol [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51(17): 9683-9690.
[25]	Bouteloup R, Mathieu D. Improved model for the refractive index: Application to potential components of ambient aerosol [J].
	Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2018, 20(34): 22017-22026.
[26]	Zhang X L, Mao M, Chen H B, et al. Lensing effect of black carbon with brown coatings: Dominant microphysics and
	parameterization [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2021, 126(3): e2020JD033549.
[27]	Ahern A T, Subramanian R, Saliba G, et al. Effect of secondary organic aerosol coating thickness on the real-time detection
	and characterization of biomass-burning soot by two particle mass spectrometers [J]. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques,
20	16, 9(12): 6117-6137.
[28]	Li J L, Li K, Wang W G, et al. Optical properties of secondary organic aerosols derived from long-chain alkanes under various
	NOx and seed conditions [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 579: 1699-1705.
[29]	Li J L, Wang W G, Li K, et al. Development and application of the multi-wavelength cavity ring-down aerosol extinction
	spectrometer [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2019, 76: 227-237.
[30]	Chen Q C, Hua X Y, Wang Y Q, et al. Semi-continuous measurement of chromophoric organic aerosols using the PILS-EEMTOC system [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2021, 244: 117941.
[31]	Wong J P S, Nenes A, Weber R J. Changes in light absorptivity of molecular weight separated brown carbon due to photolytic
	aging [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51(15): 8414-8421.
[32]	Dingle J H, Zimmerman S, Frie A L, et al. Complex refractive index, single scattering albedo, and mass absorption coefficient
	of secondary organic aerosols generated from oxidation of biogenic and anthropogenic precursors [J]. Aerosol Science and
	Technology, 2019, 53(4): 449-463.
[33]	Kwon D, Sovers M J, Grassian V H, et al. Optical properties of humic material standards: Solution phase and aerosol measurements [J]. ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 2018, 2(11): 1102-1111.
[34]	Flores J M, Washenfelder R A, Adler G, et al. Complex refractive indices in the near-ultraviolet spectral region of biogenic
	secondary organic aerosol aged with ammonia [J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2014, 16(22): 10629-10642.
[35]	Babar Z B, Park J H, Lim H J. Influence of NH3 on secondary organic aerosols from the ozonolysis and photooxidation of
	α-pinene in a flow reactor [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2017, 164: 71-84.
[36]	Nakayama T, Sato K, Imamura T, et al. Effect of oxidation process on complex refractive index of secondary organic aerosol
	generated from isoprene [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52(5): 2566-2574.
[37]	Palm B B, Campuzano-Jost P, Day D A, et al. Secondary organic aerosol formation from in situ OH, O3, and NO3 oxidation
	of ambient forest air in an oxidation flow reactor [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2017, 17(8): 5331-5354.
[38]	Li K, Li J L, Liggio J, et al. Enhanced light scattering of secondary organic aerosols by multiphase reactions [J]. Environmental
	Science & Technology, 2017, 51(3): 1285-1292.
[39]	He Q, Tomaz S, Li C, et al. Optical properties of secondary organic aerosol produced by nitrate radical oxidation of biogenic
	volatile organic compounds [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 55(5): 2878-2889.
[40]	Brege M, Paglione M, Gilardoni S, et al. Molecular insights on aging and aqueous-phase processing from ambient biomass
	burning emissions-influenced Po Valley fog and aerosol [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2018, 18(17): 13197-13214.
[41]	McDonald B C, de Gouw J A, Gilman J B, et al. Volatile chemical products emerging as largest petrochemical source of urban
	organic emissions [J]. Science, 2018, 359(6377): 760-764.
[42]	Li C, He Q, Hettiyadura A P S, et al. Formation of secondary brown carbon in biomass burning aerosol proxies through NO3
	radical reactions [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020, 54(3): 1395-1405.
[43]	Li K, Wang W G, Ge M F, et al. Optical properties of secondary organic aerosols generated by photooxidation of aromatic
	hydrocarbons [J]. Scientific Reports, 2014, 4: 4922.
[44]	Zhang W, Wang W G, Li J L, et al. Effects of SO2 on optical properties of secondary organic aerosol generated from photooxidation of toluene under different relative humidity conditions [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2020, 20(7): 4477-4492.
[45]	Jiang W, Misovich M V, Hettiyadura A P S, et al. Photosensitized reactions of a phenolic carbonyl from wood combustion
	in the aqueous phase-chemical evolution and light absorption properties of aqSOA [J]. Environmental Science & Technology,
20	21, 55(8): 5199-5211.
[46]	Haynes J P, Miller K E, Majestic B J. Investigation into photoinduced auto-oxidation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
	resulting in brown carbon production [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(2): 682-691.
[47]	Liu J M, Lin P, Laskin A, et al. Optical properties and aging of light-absorbing secondary organic aerosol [J]. Atmospheric
	Chemistry and Physics, 2016, 16(19): 12815-12827.
[48]	Li J L, Wang W G, Li K, et al. Effect of chemical structure on optical properties of secondary organic aerosols derived from
	C12 alkanes [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 751: 141620.
[49]	Li J L, Wang W G, Li K, et al. Temperature effects on optical properties and chemical composition of secondary organic
	aerosol derived from n-dodecane [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2020, 20(13): 8123-8137.
[50]	Feng Z Z, Huang M Q, Cai S Y, et al. Characterization of single scattering albedo and chemical components of aged toluene
	secondary organic aerosol [J]. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 2019, 10(6): 1736-1744.
[51]	Jiang H H, Frie A L, Lavi A, et al. Brown carbon formation from nighttime chemistry of unsaturated heterocyclic volatile
	organic compounds [J]. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2019, 6(3): 184-190.
[52]	Kwon D, Or V W, Sovers M J, et al. Aerosol brown carbon from dark reactions of syringol in aqueous aerosol mimics [J]. ACS
	Earth and Space Chemistry, 2018, 2(4): 356-365.
[53]	Marrero-Ortiz W, Hu M, Du Z, et al. Formation and optical properties of brown carbon from small α-dicarbonyls and amines
[J]	Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(1): 117-126.
[54]	Kampf C J, Filippi A, Zuth C, et al. Secondary brown carbon formation via the dicarbonyl imine pathway: Nitrogen heterocycle
	formation and synergistic effects [J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2016, 18(27): 18353-18364.
[55]	Gilardoni S, Massoli P, Paglione M, et al. Direct observation of aqueous secondary organic aerosol from biomass-burning
	emissions [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016, 113(36): 10013-
10	018.
[56]	Li Y X, Ji Y M, Zhao J Y, et al. Unexpected oligomerization of small α-dicarbonyls for secondary organic aerosol and brown
	carbon formation [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 55(8): 4430-4439.
[57]	Tran A, Williams G, Younus S, et al. Efficient formation of light-absorbing polymeric nanoparticles from the reaction of soluble
	Fe(III) with C4 and C6 dicarboxylic acids [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51(17): 9700-9708.
[58]	Fleming L T, Ali N N, Blair S L, et al. Formation of light-absorbing organosulfates during evaporation of secondary organic
	material extracts in the presence of sulfuric acid [J]. ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 2019, 3(6): 947-957.
[59]	Kodros J K, Papanastasiou D K, Paglione M, et al. Rapid dark aging of biomass burning as an overlooked source of oxidized
	organic aerosol [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020, 117(52): 33028-
33	033.
[60]	Tao J, Zhang Z S, Wu Y F, et al. Impact of particle number and mass size distributions of major chemical components on
	particle mass scattering efficiency in urban Guangzhou in Southern China [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2019,
19	(13): 8471-8490.
[61]	Kim H, Kim J Y, Jin H C, et al. Seasonal variations in the light-absorbing properties of water-soluble and insoluble organic
	aerosols in Seoul, Korea [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2016, 129: 234-242.
[62]	Huang R J, Yang L, Cao J, et al. Brown carbon aerosol in urban Xi′an, northwest China: The composition and light absorption
	properties [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52(12): 6825-6833.
[63]	Palm B B, Peng Q Y, Fredrickson C D, et al. Quantification of organic aerosol and brown carbon evolution in fresh wildfire
	plumes [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020, 117(47): 29469-29477.
[64]	Lin P, Fleming L T, Nizkorodov S A, et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of atmospheric brown carbon by high
	resolution mass spectrometry with electrospray and atmospheric pressure photoionization [J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2018,
90	(21): 12493-12502.
[65]	Wang J F, Ye J H, Zhang Q, et al. Aqueous production of secondary organic aerosol from fossil-fuel emissions in winter Beijing
	haze [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021, 118(8): e2022179118.
[66]	Chen Y, Wang W G, Liu M Y, et al. Measurement technologies of nanoparticle chemical composition and their application [J].
	Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, 2020, 15(6): 402-412.
	陈岩, 王炜罡, 刘明元, 等. 纳米颗粒物化学成分测量技术及其应用 [J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2020, 15(6): 402-412.