基于CALIOP双波长数据的海面测风信号筛选方法研究

大气与环境光学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 371-381.

基于CALIOP双波长数据的海面测风信号筛选方法研究

罗敦艺 1, 吴东 1,2*, 贺岩 3

1 中国海洋大学信息科学与工程学部海洋技术学院, 山东青岛 266100; 2 青岛海洋科学与技术试点国家实验室区域海洋动力学与数值模拟功能实验室, 山东青岛 266237; 3 中国科学院上海光学精密机械研究所, 中国科学院空间激光信息传输与探测技术重点实验室, 上海 201800

收稿日期:2022-11-18 修回日期:2023-01-13 出版日期:2024-05-28 发布日期:2024-06-11
通讯作者: E-mail: dongwu@ouc.edu.cn E-mail:dongwu@ouc.edu.cn
基金资助:
中国科学院空间激光信息传输与探测技术重点实验室开放基金项目

Screening method of sea surface signals based on CALIOP dual-wavelength data

LUO Dunyi 1, WU Dong 1,2*, HE Yan 3

1 College of Marine Technology, Faculty of Information Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China; 2 Laboratory for Regional Oceanography and Numerical Modeling, Qingdao Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266237, China; 3 Key Laboratory of Space Laser Communication and Detection Technology, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China

Received:2022-11-18 Revised:2023-01-13 Online:2024-05-28 Published:2024-06-11
Contact: Dong WU E-mail:dongwu@ouc.edu.cn
About author:罗敦艺 (1997- ), 四川内江人, 硕士研究生, 主要从事海洋与大气激光探测方面的研究。E-mail: luodunyi@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于海面后向散射模型，提出了一种利用CALIOP双波长海面信号进行数据质量控制的星载激光雷达数据筛选方法。选取CALIOP 2018 年1―9 月Version 4.1.0 level 1 数据进行全球海面风速反演，为提高数据可利用率，在无云海域探测海面风速的条件下增加了可穿透云CALIOP数据，经过大气校正和双波长信号质量控制后进行风速反演，以准同步AMSR-2 风速数据作为参考值进行检验。分别采用Cox-Munk 和Hu模型的经验关系反演风速，对于1―3 月数据，前者标准偏差分别为1.14、1.18、1.16 m/s，相关系数分别为0.90、0.91、0.91；后者标准偏差分别为1.17、1.19、1.17 m/s，相关系数分别为0.91、0.91、0.91。而相较于无云海域的反演研究，可利用数据量提高约45.5%，表明利用该方法既能保证反演精度同时又能有效提高数据可利用率，可为海面风场研究提供更多的数据源。

关键词: 遥感, 星载激光雷达, 海面后向散射, 海面风速, 信号提取

Abstract: Based on the sea surface backscattering model, a space-borne lidar data screening method using CALIOP dual-wavelength sea surface signal for data quality control is proposed. The global sea surface wind speed is retrieved from CALIOP's Version 4.1.0 level 1 data from January to September 2018. In order to improve data availability, under the condition of detecting sea surface wind speed in cloudless sea area, the cloud-penetrating CALIOP data were added, and then wind speed inversion was carried out after atmospheric correction and dual-wavelength signal quality control. At last, quasi-synchronous AMSR-2 wind speed data were used as reference values for verification. The two empirical relationships of Cox- Munk model and Hu model were used to invert wind speed respectively. For the data from January to March, the standard deviations of the former model are 1.14, 1.18 and 1.16m /s, respectively, with correlation coefficients of 0.90, 0.91 and 0.91, while the standard deviations of the latter are 1.17, 1.19 and 1.17m /s, respectively, with correlation coefficients of 0.91, 0.91 and 0.91. In addition, compared with the inversion study in cloudless sea, the available data amount using the proposed method increases by about 45.5%. The results show that the method proposed can not only ensure the accuracy of inversion but also effectively improve the utilization rate of data, which can provide more data sources for the study of sea surface wind field.

Key words: remote sensing, spaceborne lidar, sea surface backscatter, sea surface wind speed, signal extraction

中图分类号:

P733.3

罗敦艺, 吴东, 贺岩 . 基于CALIOP双波长数据的海面测风信号筛选方法研究[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2024, 19(3): 371-381.

LUO Dunyi , WU Dong , HE Yan . Screening method of sea surface signals based on CALIOP dual-wavelength data[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, 2024, 19(3): 371-381.

参考文献 22

[1]	Owlad E, Stoffelen A, Ghafarian P, et al. Wind field and gust climatology of the Persian Gulf during 1988-2010 using in-situ,
	reanalysis and satellite sea surface winds [J]. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 2022, 52: 102255.
[2]	Menzies R T, Tratt D M, Hunt W H. Lidar in-space technology experiment measurements of sea surface directional reflectance
	and the link to surface wind speed [J]. Applied Optics, 1998, 37(24): 5550-5559.
[3]	Lancaster R S, Spinhirne J D, Palm S P. Laser pulse reflectance of the ocean surface from the GLAS satellite lidar [J].
	Geophysical Research Letters, 2005, 32(22): L22S10.
[4]	Cox C, Munk W. Measurement of the roughness of the sea surface from photographs of the Sun's glitter [J]. Journal of the
	Optical Society of America, 1954, 44(11): 838-850.
[5]	Wu J. Sea-surface slope and equilibrium wind-wave spectra [J]. The Physics of Fluids, 1972, 15(5): 741-747.
[6]	Hu Y, Stamnes K, Vaughan M, et al. Sea surface wind speed estimation from space-based lidar measurements [J]. Atmospheric
	Chemistry and Physics, 2008, 8(13): 3593-3601.
[7]	Wu D, Zhang X X, Yan F Q, et al. Sea surface wind speed detection by using the data of CALIPSO lidar [J]. Acta Optica
	Sinica, 2012, 32(8): 0828002.
	吴东, 张小雪, 阎逢旗, 等. 基于星载激光雷达数据的海面风速探测 [J]. 光学学报, 2012, 32(8): 0828002.
[8]	Sun Y C, Wu D. Comparison of day and night sea surface wind speed detection using CALIPSO lidar measurements [J].
	Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2013, 30(1): 29-35.
	孙雨辰, 吴东. 星载激光雷达探测海面风速昼夜差异研究 [J]. 量子电子学报, 2013, 30(1): 29-35.
[9]	He M, Hu Y X, Huang J P, et al. Aerosol optical depth under "clear" sky conditions derived from sea surface reflection of lidar
	signals [J]. Optics Express, 2016, 24(26): A1618.
[10]	Tang Q, Hu Y X, Li W, et al. Optimizing cirrus optical depth retrievals over the ocean from collocated CALIPSO and AMSRE
	observations [J]. Applied Optics, 2018, 57(26): 7472-7481.
[11]	Murphy A, Hu Y X. Retrieving aerosol optical depth and high spatial resolution ocean surface wind speed from CALIPSO: A
	neural network approach [J]. Frontiers in Remote Sensing, 2021, 1: 614029.
[12]	Zhou X, Yang J, Li S. Model of sea surface echos from spaceborne single photon lidar [J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2021, 41(19):
19	28002.
	周鑫, 杨坚, 李松. 星载单光子激光雷达海面回波信号模型 [J]. 光学学报, 2021, 41(19): 1928002.
[13]	Winker D, Pelon J, Coakley J, et al. THE CALIPSO MISSION: A global 3D view of aerosols and clouds [J]. Bulletin of the
	American Meteorological Society, 2010, 91(9): 1211-1229.
[14]	Cox C, Munk W. Statistics of the sea surface derived from Sun glitter [J]. Journal of Marine Research, 1954, 13: 198-227.
[15]	Palm S, Yang Y K, Herzfeld U, et al. ICESat-2 algorithm theoretical basis document for the atmosphere, Part I: Level 2 and 3
	data products [EB/OL]. (2020-02-14) [2022-10-30]. https://icesat-2. gsfc. nasa. gov/sites/default/files/page_files/
	ICESat2_ATL04_ATL09_ATBD_r003.pdf.
[16]	Hendrik C, Twersky V. Light Scattering by Small Particles [M]. New York: Dover Publications, Inc, 1981: 107.
[17]	Bohren C F, Huffman D R. Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles [M]. Berlin: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH,
	1998.
[18]	Beyerle G, Gross M R, Haner D A, et al. A lidar and backscatter sonde measurement campaign at table mountain during
	february-march 1997: Observations of cirrus clouds [J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2001, 58(10): 1275-1287.
[19]	Wentz F J. AMSR Ocean Algorithm [EB/OL]. (2000-11-02)[2022-10-30]. https://eospso.gsfc.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atbd/
	atbd-amsr-ocean.pdf.
[20]	Wentz, F J, Gentemann C, Ashcroft P. On-orbit calibration of AMSR-E and the retrieval of ocean products [C]. 83rd AMS
	Annual Meeting, American Meteorological Society, Long Beach, CA, 2003.
[21]	Ebuchi N. Evaluation of marine surface winds observed by SeaWinds and AMSR on ADEOS-II [J]. Journal of Oceanography,
20	06, 62(3): 293-301.
[22]	Massel S R. Ocean Waves Breaking and Marine Aerosol Fluxes [M]. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2007.